Neurophysiological monitoring for epilepsy surgery: the Talairach SEEG method. StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy. Indications, results, complications and therapeutic applications in a series of 100 consecutive cases

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_8A4258B3A1B8
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Neurophysiological monitoring for epilepsy surgery: the Talairach SEEG method. StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy. Indications, results, complications and therapeutic applications in a series of 100 consecutive cases
Périodique
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Guenot M., Isnard J., Ryvlin P., Fischer C., Ostrowsky K., Mauguiere F., Sindou M.
ISSN
1011-6125 (Print)
ISSN-L
1011-6125
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2001
Volume
77
Numéro
1-4
Pages
29-32
Langue
anglais
Notes
Guenot, M
Isnard, J
Ryvlin, P
Fischer, C
Ostrowsky, K
Mauguiere, F
Sindou, M
eng
Switzerland
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2001;77(1-4):29-32. doi: 10.1159/000064595.
Résumé
OBJECT OF THE STUDY: In some candidates for epilepsy surgery in whom the decision to operate is difficult to make, invasive presurgical investigations, namely depth electrode recordings, may be needed. The SEEG (StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy) method consists of stereotactic orthogonal implantation of depth electrodes (5 to 15, 11 on average). The object of this study is to clarify the indications for SEEG, to expose its complications, and to display its usefulness in terms of surgical strategy and results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients, suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy and selected as candidates for surgical resection, underwent SEEG between 1996 and 2000. A total of 1,118 electrodes were implanted. For each single case, the sites of implantation of the electrodes were chosen in order to determine either the side of the onset of seizures, or the uni- or multilobar feature of them, or a possible operculo-insular propagation from a temporal onset, and also, using direct electrode stimulation, the proximity of speech or motor area. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 5 patients (2 superficial infections, 2 breakages of electrodes, and 1 intracerebral hematoma responsible for death). SEEG was helpful in most (84%) of the 100 patients to confirm or annul surgical indication, and to adjust the extent of the resection. In some cases (14%), SEEG allowed to propose a resection that might have been disputable based solely on noninvasive investigation data. For frontal epilepsy, SEEG was crucial in all cases to delineate the extent of resection. CONCLUSION: SEEG proved to be a relatively safe and a very useful method in 'difficult' candidates for epilepsy surgery. In addition, in some cases the implanted electrodes can be used to perform therapeutic RF thermocoagulation of epileptic foci or networks.
Mots-clé
Adult, Catheter Ablation, Cerebral Angiography, Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology, Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects, Electroencephalography/instrumentation/*methods, Epilepsy/*surgery, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/surgery, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation/*methods, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Retrospective Studies, Skin Diseases, Infectious/etiology, *Stereotaxic Techniques/instrumentation
Pubmed
Création de la notice
29/11/2018 13:36
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:49
Données d'usage