Current practices of physiotherapists in Switzerland regarding fall risk-assessment for community-dwelling older adults: A national cross-sectional survey.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_84F0EDB09092
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Current practices of physiotherapists in Switzerland regarding fall risk-assessment for community-dwelling older adults: A national cross-sectional survey.
Périodique
F1000Research
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Duc M., Mittaz Hager A.G., Zemp D., Roulet G., Bridel A., Hilfiker R.
ISSN
2046-1402 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2046-1402
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Pages
513
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Falls can strongly impact older people's quality of life, health, and lifestyle. Multifactorial assessment can determine an individual's risk of falling as the first step for fall prevention intervention. Physiotherapists have an essential role to play in assessing fall risk by older adults living in the community. In the absence of published data on this topic in Switzerland, this study investigated the current practices of physiotherapists to determine whether those are in line with recommendations.
An anonymous cross-sectional survey was undertaken among physiotherapists practising in Switzerland between the 21st of November and the 31st of December 2020. A priori and exploratory hypotheses were tested. Responses to open-ended questions were grouped into themes for analysis.
A total of 938 questionnaires from all three language regions of Switzerland was analysed. Participants worked in different settings, with a higher representation of private practice self-employees (56%). Standardised fall risk assessments or instruments were used by 580 (62%) participants, while 235 (25%) preferred subjective assessment of fall risk only. Differences in fall risk assessment were observed according to the workplace setting (adjusted OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.7) and education level (trend test, p<0.001). The standardised assessments most frequently employed were the Berg Balance Scale (58%), the Timed-Up-and-Go (57%) and the Tinetti Balance Assessment tool (47%). Risk factors for falls were frequently queried, particularly history of falls (88%), home hazards (84%), and functional ability (81%). Technical resources (40%), knowledge (30%), and time (22%) were common barriers to implement a systematic fall risk assessment.
This study provides an overview of the current practices of physiotherapists in Switzerland in fall risk assessment. There is still room to optimise the standardisation and systematisation of this assessment to implement a best practice strategy and prevent avoidable falls.
Mots-clé
Humans, Aged, Independent Living, Cross-Sectional Studies, Quality of Life, Physical Therapists, Switzerland, Risk Assessment, Accidental falls, Elderly, Prevention, Risk assessment
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
09/01/2024 13:15
Dernière modification de la notice
10/01/2024 8:16
Données d'usage