Posterior perineal hernia repair with perineal approach: a video vignette.
Détails
Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_8473054F4BE6
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Lettre (letter): communication adressée à l'éditeur.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Posterior perineal hernia repair with perineal approach: a video vignette.
Périodique
Colorectal disease
ISSN
1463-1318 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1462-8910
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
25
Numéro
5
Pages
1056-1057
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Video-Audio Media ; Letter
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Perineal hernia (PH) is a well-known complication after abdominopelvic resection, but no consensus exists about the best technique for perineal hernia repair (Reference 1-3). We present the case of a man with a posterior perineal hernia after low anterior resection with subtotal inter-sphincter resection and colo-anal anastomosis.
The patient is a 72-year-old man known to have an adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (50 Gy and Xeloda) and low anterior resection with subtotal inter-sphincteric resection, colo-anal anastomosis and protective ileostomy in December 2015. In 2016, the patient presented with 3 episodes of recurrent prolapse of the colo-anal anastomosis requiring resection of the prolapse and a new colo-anal anastomosis with anterior and posterior levatroplasty during the last intervention. The protective ileostomy was finally closed in December 2016. In December 2019, the patient complained about a new perineal swelling without pain. A surgical management for perineal hernia was proposed, but refused by the patient. In January 2022, because of the inconvenience caused by the perineal hernia, the patient accepted a surgical intervention. A pelvic MRI was performed in January 2022 with evidence of a large perineal hernia with mesocolic content, no cancer recurrence. The repair was made through a perineal approach with a bioasbrobable monofilament polyester mesh with little tissue attachment (Symbotex, Covidien Product, Medtronic Parkway, Minneapolis, USA). The operation lasted 104 min, with minor bleeding (<20ml). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. At 7-month follow-up, he has no recurrence of the perineal hernia.
Perineal hernia is vey a rare complication following restorative rectal cancer surgery. As a result, management is poorly described in the literature. As the patient presented with 3 prolapses of the colo-anal anastomosis requiring surgical repair with absolutely no adhesions before the perineal hernia repair, we choose a mesh repair to strengthen the pelvic floor and a direct perineal approach to perform levatorplasty.
The patient is a 72-year-old man known to have an adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (50 Gy and Xeloda) and low anterior resection with subtotal inter-sphincteric resection, colo-anal anastomosis and protective ileostomy in December 2015. In 2016, the patient presented with 3 episodes of recurrent prolapse of the colo-anal anastomosis requiring resection of the prolapse and a new colo-anal anastomosis with anterior and posterior levatroplasty during the last intervention. The protective ileostomy was finally closed in December 2016. In December 2019, the patient complained about a new perineal swelling without pain. A surgical management for perineal hernia was proposed, but refused by the patient. In January 2022, because of the inconvenience caused by the perineal hernia, the patient accepted a surgical intervention. A pelvic MRI was performed in January 2022 with evidence of a large perineal hernia with mesocolic content, no cancer recurrence. The repair was made through a perineal approach with a bioasbrobable monofilament polyester mesh with little tissue attachment (Symbotex, Covidien Product, Medtronic Parkway, Minneapolis, USA). The operation lasted 104 min, with minor bleeding (<20ml). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. At 7-month follow-up, he has no recurrence of the perineal hernia.
Perineal hernia is vey a rare complication following restorative rectal cancer surgery. As a result, management is poorly described in the literature. As the patient presented with 3 prolapses of the colo-anal anastomosis requiring surgical repair with absolutely no adhesions before the perineal hernia repair, we choose a mesh repair to strengthen the pelvic floor and a direct perineal approach to perform levatorplasty.
Mots-clé
Humans, Herniorrhaphy, Hernia, Abdominal/surgery, Rectal Neoplasms/surgery, Perineum/surgery, Surgical Mesh, Hernia/etiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
12/12/2022 11:34
Dernière modification de la notice
09/06/2023 5:54