A pilot randomized study comparing high and low volume hemofiltration on vasopressor use in septic shock.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_8273D47D2960
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
A pilot randomized study comparing high and low volume hemofiltration on vasopressor use in septic shock.
Périodique
Intensive care medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Boussekey N., Chiche A., Faure K., Devos P., Guery B., d'Escrivan T., Georges H., Leroy O.
ISSN
0342-4642 (Print)
ISSN-L
0342-4642
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Numéro
9
Pages
1646-1653
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
High volume hemofiltration (HVHF) has shown potential benefits in septic animals and a few reports suggested a hemodynamic improvement in humans. However, randomized studies are still lacking. Our goal was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of HVHF in septic shock patients with acute renal failure (ARF).
Prospective randomized study in an intensive care unit (ICU).
Twenty patients with septic shock and ARF.
Patients were randomized to either high volume hemofiltration [HVHF 65 ml/(kg h)] or low volume hemofiltration [LVHF 35 ml/(kg h). Vasopressor dose was adjusted to reach a mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg.
We performed six hourly measurements of MAP, norepinephrine dose, PaO(2)/FiO(2) and lactate, and four daily urine output and logistic organ dysfunction (LOD) score. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable on randomization. Mean norepinephrine dose decreased more rapidly after 24 h of HVHF treatment compared to LVHF treatment (P = 0.004) whereas lactate and PaO(2)/FiO(2) did not differ between the two treatment groups. During the 4-day follow-up, urine output was slightly increased in the HVHF group (P = 0.059) but the LOD score evolution was not different. Duration of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and ICU length of stay were also comparable. Survival on day 28 was not affected.
HVHF decreased vasopressor requirement and tended to increase urine output in septic shock patients with renal failure. However, a larger trial is required to confirm our results and perhaps to show a benefit in survival.
Mots-clé
APACHE, Acute Kidney Injury/complications, Acute Kidney Injury/therapy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure/drug effects, Female, Hemofiltration/methods, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine/administration & dosage, Norepinephrine/therapeutic use, Respiration, Artificial, Shock, Septic/classification, Shock, Septic/complications, Shock, Septic/therapy, Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage, Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
29/04/2021 10:59
Dernière modification de la notice
17/07/2023 14:59
Données d'usage