Can the radiological scale "iNPH Radscale" predict tap test response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_816A72BB72D6
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Can the radiological scale "iNPH Radscale" predict tap test response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?
Périodique
Journal of the neurological sciences
ISSN
1878-5883 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0022-510X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
15/01/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
420
Pages
117239
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) presents typical radiological signs that have been summarised in a semi-quantitative scale named the iNPH Radscale. However, the iNPH Radscale's predictive value for response to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test has never been studied. This study aims to investigate if the iNPH Radscale can predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test.
A total of 100 patients with iNPH (age: 76.3 ± 7.9, gender: 36% female) were included in this retrospective study. Two raters, blinded to the response of the CSF tap test, evaluated the iNPH Radscale and its seven subitems (Evan's index, callosal angle, size of temporal horns, narrow high-convexity sulci, dilated Sylvian fissures, focally dilated sulci, and periventricular hypodensities). Locomotion improvement was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed before, and 24 h after, the CSF tap test.
The iNPH Radscale (total score) was similar between the CSF tap test responders and non-responders (responders: 8.31 ± 1.96, non-responders: 9.18 ± 2.51, p = 0.128). However, the temporal horns score was smaller in the responders group (1.66 ± 0.57 versus 1.94 ± 0.24, p = 0.045), even after adjusting for age, gender, education level, white matter changes, and global cognition (β: -0.250, C.I. 95%: [-3.185; -0.161], p = 0.031).
The iNPH Radscale (total score) does not predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test, while a smaller temporal horns score at baseline is associated with a positive tap test responder status.
A total of 100 patients with iNPH (age: 76.3 ± 7.9, gender: 36% female) were included in this retrospective study. Two raters, blinded to the response of the CSF tap test, evaluated the iNPH Radscale and its seven subitems (Evan's index, callosal angle, size of temporal horns, narrow high-convexity sulci, dilated Sylvian fissures, focally dilated sulci, and periventricular hypodensities). Locomotion improvement was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed before, and 24 h after, the CSF tap test.
The iNPH Radscale (total score) was similar between the CSF tap test responders and non-responders (responders: 8.31 ± 1.96, non-responders: 9.18 ± 2.51, p = 0.128). However, the temporal horns score was smaller in the responders group (1.66 ± 0.57 versus 1.94 ± 0.24, p = 0.045), even after adjusting for age, gender, education level, white matter changes, and global cognition (β: -0.250, C.I. 95%: [-3.185; -0.161], p = 0.031).
The iNPH Radscale (total score) does not predict locomotion improvement after CSF tap test, while a smaller temporal horns score at baseline is associated with a positive tap test responder status.
Mots-clé
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Female, Humans, Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnostic imaging, Male, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Gait, Imaging, Normal pressure hydrocephalus, TUG, Tap test
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
04/10/2023 21:33
Dernière modification de la notice
09/01/2024 16:18