Prescription of hypnotics during hospital stay: an epidemiological study in a Swiss hospital
Détails
Télécharger: BIB_8119D32BD45B.P001.pdf (628.21 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_8119D32BD45B
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Poster: résume de manière illustrée et sur une page unique les résultats d'un projet de recherche. Les résumés de poster doivent être entrés sous "Abstract" et non "Poster".
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Prescription of hypnotics during hospital stay: an epidemiological study in a Swiss hospital
Titre de la conférence
GSASA-Kongress, Gesellschaft Schweizerischer Amt- und Spitalapotheker = Congrès annuel de la GSASA, Société suisse des pharmaciens de l'administration et des hôpitaux
Adresse
Zürich, Switzerland, November 26-27, 2015
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Background & Objectives: Hypnotics have been associated with many adverse effects, such as drowsiness, confusion, falls and dizziness, especially in elderly population. Moreover, chronic use can cause decreased cognitive performance and addiction. A regional prevention campaign "Hypnotic? Not necessarily needed" conducted in the Canton of Vaud, focused on this topic. This study aims to describe introduction and discharge prescription of hypnotic drugs during stay in an internal medicine ward.
Methods: The study took place in a 70-bed internal medicine department of a Swiss regional hospital for a period of 3 months. Inclusion criteria were: age 18 or more, hospital stay for more than 24 hours, discernment and patient's approval. Demographic data (age, gender, diagnosis, co-morbidity) and medication data (chronic hypnotic use, hypnotic's introduction, day of introduction, drug-related problems, and administrative data) were collected.
Results: 290 patients were included. 73% of them were over 65 years old and 58% were women. 34% had a chronic use of hypnotics before hospital stay and 44% had a prescription for hypnotics after hospital stay. Hypnotics medication were introduced in 37% (n=108) of patients, mostly as required (68%). Half (52%) of hypnotics were prescribed during the first 24 hours of hospital stay and 76% of these introductions were not reassessed during hospital stay. Drugs introduced were: benzodiazepines (47%), clomethiazol (32%), benzodiazepine related drugs (11%; zolpidem, zopiclone) and other hypnotics (10%; herbal drugs, melatonin, antidepressant and antipsychotic). Different hypnotics were used depending on age: lorazepam for people < 65 years old, and clomethiazol for ≥ 65 years old. Drug-drug interactions were detected in 68% of new hypnotic prescription: 87% pharmacodynamic (mutual increase of adverse reactions) and 13% pharmacokinetic (impact on drug disposition). After hospital stay, 37% (n=40) of the patients had a new hypnotic drugs on their discharge prescription compared to their preadmission treatment.
Discussion & Conclusions: Introduction of an hypnotic medication happened in nearly 40% of hospitalized patients. Most of the time, physicians reassessed the new hypnotic on discharges prescriptions, one-third of hypnotics are kept at the end of the hospital stay. These prescriptions may generate chronic use and expose patients to drug-related problem (adverse effects and interactions).
Methods: The study took place in a 70-bed internal medicine department of a Swiss regional hospital for a period of 3 months. Inclusion criteria were: age 18 or more, hospital stay for more than 24 hours, discernment and patient's approval. Demographic data (age, gender, diagnosis, co-morbidity) and medication data (chronic hypnotic use, hypnotic's introduction, day of introduction, drug-related problems, and administrative data) were collected.
Results: 290 patients were included. 73% of them were over 65 years old and 58% were women. 34% had a chronic use of hypnotics before hospital stay and 44% had a prescription for hypnotics after hospital stay. Hypnotics medication were introduced in 37% (n=108) of patients, mostly as required (68%). Half (52%) of hypnotics were prescribed during the first 24 hours of hospital stay and 76% of these introductions were not reassessed during hospital stay. Drugs introduced were: benzodiazepines (47%), clomethiazol (32%), benzodiazepine related drugs (11%; zolpidem, zopiclone) and other hypnotics (10%; herbal drugs, melatonin, antidepressant and antipsychotic). Different hypnotics were used depending on age: lorazepam for people < 65 years old, and clomethiazol for ≥ 65 years old. Drug-drug interactions were detected in 68% of new hypnotic prescription: 87% pharmacodynamic (mutual increase of adverse reactions) and 13% pharmacokinetic (impact on drug disposition). After hospital stay, 37% (n=40) of the patients had a new hypnotic drugs on their discharge prescription compared to their preadmission treatment.
Discussion & Conclusions: Introduction of an hypnotic medication happened in nearly 40% of hospitalized patients. Most of the time, physicians reassessed the new hypnotic on discharges prescriptions, one-third of hypnotics are kept at the end of the hospital stay. These prescriptions may generate chronic use and expose patients to drug-related problem (adverse effects and interactions).
Création de la notice
25/08/2016 10:28
Dernière modification de la notice
21/08/2019 5:36