Efficacy of Two Cleaning Solutions for the Decontamination of 10 Antineoplastic Agents in the Biosafety Cabinets of a Hospital Pharmacy

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (2067.30 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_7D2A3A283442
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Efficacy of Two Cleaning Solutions for the Decontamination of 10 Antineoplastic Agents in the Biosafety Cabinets of a Hospital Pharmacy
Périodique
Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Anastasi M., Rudaz S., Queruau Lamerie T., Odou P., Bonnabry P., Fleury-Souverain S.
ISSN
1475-3162 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0003-4878
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Volume
59
Numéro
7
Pages
895-908
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Evaluation Studies ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate two cleaning solutions for the chemical decontamination of antineoplastic agents on the surfaces of two biosafety cabinets routinely used for chemotherapy preparation in a hospital pharmacy.
METHODS: For almost 1 year (49 weeks), two different solutions were used for the weekly cleaning of two biosafety cabinets in a hospital pharmacy's centralized cytotoxic preparation unit. The solutions evaluated were a commercial solution of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water (70:30, vol:vol), and a detergent solution constituted by 10(-2)M of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with 20% IPA. Seven areas in each biosafety cabinet were wiped 14 times throughout the year, before and after the weekly cleaning process, according to a validated procedure. Samples were analyzed using a validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The decontamination efficacy of these two solutions was tested for 10 antineoplastic agents: cytarabine, gemcitabine, methotrexate, etoposide phosphate, irinotecan, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, and vincristine.
RESULTS: Overall decontamination efficacies observed were 82±6% and 49±11% for SDS solution and IPA, respectively. Higher contamination levels were distributed on areas frequently touched by the pharmacy technicians-such as sleeves and airlock handles-than on scale plates, gravimetric control hardware, and work benches. Detected contaminations of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and cytarabine were higher than those of the others agents. SDS solution was almost 20% more efficient than IPA on eight of the antineoplastic agents.
CONCLUSION: Both cleaning solutions were able to reduce contamination levels in the biosafety cabinets. The efficacy of the solution containing an anionic detergent agent (SDS) was shown to be generally higher than that of IPA and, after the SDS cleaning procedure, biosafety cabinets demonstrated acceptable contamination levels.
Mots-clé
2-Propanol/analysis, Antineoplastic Agents/analysis, Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity, Decontamination/methods, Environmental Monitoring/methods, Equipment Contamination/prevention & control, Occupational Exposure/analysis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
13/07/2018 9:00
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 7:55
Données d'usage