Use of clinical tolerance limits for assessing agreement.
Détails
Télécharger: 36352556_BIB_75FF21FC6045.pdf (1865.08 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_75FF21FC6045
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Use of clinical tolerance limits for assessing agreement.
Périodique
Statistical methods in medical research
ISSN
1477-0334 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0962-2802
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Numéro
1
Pages
195-206
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
In this study, we have further extended the methodology proposed, first, by Lin et al. (2002) and, later, extended by Stevens et al. (2017, 2018), on the coverage probability/probability of agreement, by relaxing the strong parametric assumptions regarding the distribution of the latent trait and developing inference methods allowing to compute both pointwise and simultaneous confidence bands. The methodology requires repeated measurements by at least one of the two measurement methods and accommodates heteroscedastic measurement errors. It performs often very well even when one has only one measurement by one of the two measurement methods and at least five repeated measurements from the other. It circumvents some of the deficiencies of the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method and provides a more direct assessment of the agreement level.
Mots-clé
Probability, Agreement, differential bias, limits of agreement, method comparison, proportional bias, tolerance limits
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
24/11/2022 9:34
Dernière modification de la notice
23/01/2024 7:28