Efficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_74DAD42F3CB9
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Efficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis.
Périodique
Minerva pediatrica
ISSN
1827-1715 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0026-4946
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
08/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
70
Numéro
4
Pages
371-382
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To compare the ability of Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk levels in adolescents.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed after a database search for relevant literature (Cochrane, Centre for Review and Dissemination, PubMed, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, BIOSIS citation index, ChildData, metaRegister).
The study included 117 records representing 96 studies with 994,595 participants were included in the systematic review, 14 of which (13 studies, N.=14,610) were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that BMI was a strong indicator of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin; but not total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein or glucose. Few studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis considering WC or WHtR (N.≤2). The narrative synthesis found measures of central adiposity to be consistently valid indicators of the same risk factors as BMI.
BMI was an indicator of CVD risk. WC and WHtR were efficacious for indicating the same risk factors BMI performed strongly for, though there was insufficient evidence to judge the relative strength of each measure possibly due to heterogeneity in the methods for measuring and classifying WC.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed after a database search for relevant literature (Cochrane, Centre for Review and Dissemination, PubMed, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, BIOSIS citation index, ChildData, metaRegister).
The study included 117 records representing 96 studies with 994,595 participants were included in the systematic review, 14 of which (13 studies, N.=14,610) were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that BMI was a strong indicator of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin; but not total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein or glucose. Few studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis considering WC or WHtR (N.≤2). The narrative synthesis found measures of central adiposity to be consistently valid indicators of the same risk factors as BMI.
BMI was an indicator of CVD risk. WC and WHtR were efficacious for indicating the same risk factors BMI performed strongly for, though there was insufficient evidence to judge the relative strength of each measure possibly due to heterogeneity in the methods for measuring and classifying WC.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Anthropometry/methods, Body Mass Index, Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology, Humans, Risk Factors, Waist Circumference/physiology, Waist-Height Ratio
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/04/2018 18:15
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:32
Données d'usage
