Supported decision making for people with mental health disorders in clinical practice: a systematic review.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_70DACF7EA0B6
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Supported decision making for people with mental health disorders in clinical practice: a systematic review.
Périodique
International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Penzenstadler L., Molodynski A., Khazaal Y.
ISSN
1471-1788 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1365-1501
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
24
Numéro
1
Pages
3-9
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Objectives: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was adopted at the United Nations Assembly in 2006. The main aim of the convention is to ensure equal rights for people with disabilities including the expression of people's own "will and preferences" concerning health treatment. Article 12 demands the respect of a person's "rights, will and preferences" (CRPD) and suggests supported decision making (SDM) when possible. The aim of this review was to gather information regarding the SDM implementation from a clinical perspective for people with mental health disorders.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, and PsycINFO using the keywords "supported decision making" and "UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities" in March 2018.Results: Eleven articles were included in the final review, which focussed on three themes: (1) different models of SDM, (2) stakeholder views, and (3) challenges for implementation. A limited number of papers described clinical models that had good theoretical consistency with SDM. The main challenges of implementation related to critical situations when "will and preferences" are poorly understood or appear contradictory. Future studies should assess specific models of SDM implementation, including related outcomes and process measures.
Mots-clé
Decision Making, Shared, Humans, Mental Disorders/therapy, Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence, Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence, CRPD, convention on the Right of Persons with Disabilities, mental health disorders, supported decision making
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
16/10/2019 19:03
Dernière modification de la notice
02/11/2021 6:39
Données d'usage