Alu expression in human cell lines and their retrotranspositional potential.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_6EB3C4A856F3.P001.pdf (736.87 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6EB3C4A856F3
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Alu expression in human cell lines and their retrotranspositional potential.
Périodique
Mobile DNA
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Oler A.J., Traina-Dorge S., Derbes R.S., Canella D., Cairns B.R., Roy-Engel A.M.
ISSN
1759-8753 (Electronic)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Volume
3
Numéro
1
Pages
11
Langue
anglais
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The vast majority of the 1.1 million Alu elements are retrotranspositionally inactive, where only a few loci referred to as 'source elements' can generate new Alu insertions. The first step in identifying the active Alu sources is to determine the loci transcribed by RNA polymerase III (pol III). Previous genome-wide analyses from normal and transformed cell lines identified multiple Alu loci occupied by pol III factors, making them candidate source elements.
FINDINGS: Analysis of the data from these genome-wide studies determined that the majority of pol III-bound Alus belonged to the older subfamilies Alu S and Alu J, which varied between cell lines from 62.5% to 98.7% of the identified loci. The pol III-bound Alus were further scored for estimated retrotransposition potential (ERP) based on the absence or presence of selected sequence features associated with Alu retrotransposition capability. Our analyses indicate that most of the pol III-bound Alu loci candidates identified lack the sequence characteristics important for retrotransposition.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that Alu expression likely varies by cell type, growth conditions and transformation state. This variation could extend to where the same cell lines in different laboratories present different Alu expression patterns. The vast majority of Alu loci potentially transcribed by RNA pol III lack important sequence features for retrotransposition and the majority of potentially active Alu loci in the genome (scored high ERP) belong to young Alu subfamilies. Our observations suggest that in an in vivo scenario, the contribution of Alu activity on somatic genetic damage may significantly vary between individuals and tissues.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
04/07/2013 10:45
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:27
Données d'usage