Poly2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) coated oxygenator: an ex vivo study.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6E1071B078D0
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Poly2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) coated oxygenator: an ex vivo study.
Périodique
International Journal of Artificial Organs
ISSN
0391-3988 (Print)
ISSN-L
0391-3988
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2002
Volume
25
Numéro
3
Pages
223-229
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
PMEA is a hydrophilic polymer coating with a unique design that minimizes the adsorption and denaturation of proteins and blood cells. This study compares thrombus resistance, blood path resistance, thrombocyte profile, and blood trauma of the PMEA coated Capiox membrane oxygenator (Terumo, Japan) vs. an uncoated version.
METHOD: Six calves (mean bodyweight: 75.3 +/- 4.5kg) were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass for 6 hours and randomly assigned to the coated or uncoated oxygenator, with a low heparinisation protocol (ACT > 180s).
RESULTS: Macroscopically, red staining was observed in all uncoated oxygenators, and in none of the coated ones. Inlet pressure was significantly higher in the uncoated group (at 1 h: 279 +/- 25 vs. 175 +/- 11mmHg, p < 0.01 and at 6h: 217 +/- 10 vs. 171(8mmHg, p < 0.01). Thrombocyte count values (corrected for hematocrit and normalized by prebypass values) were significantly higher in the coated group (at 1 h: 76 +/- 6 vs. 53 +/- 13%, p < 0.01 and at 6 h: 70 +/- 6 vs. 44 +/- 26%, p < 0.01). Plasma hemoglobin was below 100mg/L in both groups throughout the experiments.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with uncoated oxygenator, PMEA coated oxygenator exhibited increased thrombus resistance with lower inlet pressure and lower thrombocyte consumption. In both groups, trauma to red cells was minimal, emphasizing the efficient design of this type of oxygenator.
METHOD: Six calves (mean bodyweight: 75.3 +/- 4.5kg) were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass for 6 hours and randomly assigned to the coated or uncoated oxygenator, with a low heparinisation protocol (ACT > 180s).
RESULTS: Macroscopically, red staining was observed in all uncoated oxygenators, and in none of the coated ones. Inlet pressure was significantly higher in the uncoated group (at 1 h: 279 +/- 25 vs. 175 +/- 11mmHg, p < 0.01 and at 6h: 217 +/- 10 vs. 171(8mmHg, p < 0.01). Thrombocyte count values (corrected for hematocrit and normalized by prebypass values) were significantly higher in the coated group (at 1 h: 76 +/- 6 vs. 53 +/- 13%, p < 0.01 and at 6 h: 70 +/- 6 vs. 44 +/- 26%, p < 0.01). Plasma hemoglobin was below 100mg/L in both groups throughout the experiments.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with uncoated oxygenator, PMEA coated oxygenator exhibited increased thrombus resistance with lower inlet pressure and lower thrombocyte consumption. In both groups, trauma to red cells was minimal, emphasizing the efficient design of this type of oxygenator.
Mots-clé
Acrylates, Animals, Cardiopulmonary Bypass/instrumentation, Cattle, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Erythrocyte Count, Hematocrit, Hemoglobins/analysis, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood, Oxygenators, Platelet Count, Polymers, Thrombosis/blood
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
28/01/2008 9:28
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:27