Does monitoring of pre-/post-dialyzer pressure difference improve efficiency in intermittent hemodialysis?
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6D315ECF874F
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Does monitoring of pre-/post-dialyzer pressure difference improve efficiency in intermittent hemodialysis?
Périodique
Blood Purification
ISSN
0253-5068 (Print)
ISSN-L
0253-5068
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2003
Volume
21
Numéro
4-5
Pages
294-300
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of pre-/post-dialyzer pressure difference (DeltaP) is widely used in continuous renal replacement therapies to monitor extracorporeal circuit function. The aim of this study was to verify whether DeltaP may help to identify chronic subclinical worsening of dialysis quality due to incomplete dialyzer clotting in intermittent hemodialysis.
METHODS: Nine chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled in the study and dialyzed twice (high-flux polysulfone dialyzer) with DeltaP and urea-clearance monitoring: the first session with a standard anticoagulation and the second without. To verify whether a visible clotting of the dialyzer precedes or follows a significant DeltaP increase, we checked the dialyzers for the presence of red clots after a saline flush performed when a 50% increase in DeltaP was registered.
RESULTS: In the second dialysis session after a 50% increase in DeltaP (documented in 7/9 patients), all dialyzers, after saline flush, showed a visible fiber clotting but not a significant reduction (>15%) in urea clearance. In the majority of the patients (6/7), until a few minutes before complete occlusion of the extracorporeal circuit, the urea clearance did not change significantly (-8.9 +/- 12.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: The usual check of the presence or absence of red clots in the dialyzer at the end of the dialysis session is enough, in the absence of red clots, to ensure that dialyzer efficiency is maintained during the whole treatment. Contrary to what is applied in CRRT, a continuous monitoring of DeltaP during intermittent hemodialysis would not significantly help to unmask unnoticed inefficient hemodialysis sessions.
METHODS: Nine chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled in the study and dialyzed twice (high-flux polysulfone dialyzer) with DeltaP and urea-clearance monitoring: the first session with a standard anticoagulation and the second without. To verify whether a visible clotting of the dialyzer precedes or follows a significant DeltaP increase, we checked the dialyzers for the presence of red clots after a saline flush performed when a 50% increase in DeltaP was registered.
RESULTS: In the second dialysis session after a 50% increase in DeltaP (documented in 7/9 patients), all dialyzers, after saline flush, showed a visible fiber clotting but not a significant reduction (>15%) in urea clearance. In the majority of the patients (6/7), until a few minutes before complete occlusion of the extracorporeal circuit, the urea clearance did not change significantly (-8.9 +/- 12.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: The usual check of the presence or absence of red clots in the dialyzer at the end of the dialysis session is enough, in the absence of red clots, to ensure that dialyzer efficiency is maintained during the whole treatment. Contrary to what is applied in CRRT, a continuous monitoring of DeltaP during intermittent hemodialysis would not significantly help to unmask unnoticed inefficient hemodialysis sessions.
Mots-clé
Adult, Anticoagulants/pharmacology, Anticoagulants/therapeutic use, Blood Coagulation, Equipment Failure Analysis/methods, Female, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Polymers, Pressure, Renal Dialysis/methods, Renal Dialysis/standards, Sulfones
Pubmed
Création de la notice
24/07/2013 9:16
Dernière modification de la notice
16/04/2020 5:26