Current practice and perceptions of safety protocols for the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the operating room: results of the IP-OR international survey

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 34222648_BIB_6CED330173D4.pdf (685.40 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6CED330173D4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Current practice and perceptions of safety protocols for the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the operating room: results of the IP-OR international survey
Périodique
Pleura and Peritoneum
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Clerc Daniel, Hübner Martin, Ashwin K.R., Somashekhar S.P., Rau Beate, Ceelen Wim, Willaert Wouter, Bakrin Naoual, Laplace Nathalie, Al Hosni Mohammed, Garcia Lozcano Edgar Luis, Blaj Sebastian, Piso Pompiliu, Di Giorgio Andrea, Vizzelli Giuseppe, Brigand Cécile, Delhorme Jean-Baptiste, Klipfel Amandine, Archid Rami, Nadiradze Giorgi, Reymond Marc A., Sgarbura Olivia
ISSN
2364-768X
2364-7671
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
26/02/2021
Volume
6
Numéro
1
Pages
39-45
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Objectives: To assess the risk perception and the uptake of measures preventing environment-related risks in the operating room (OR) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).
Methods: A multicentric, international survey among OR teams in high-volume HIPEC and PIPAC centers: Surgeons (Surg), Scrub nurses (ScrubN), Anesthesiologists (Anest), Anesthesiology nurses (AnesthN), and OR Cleaning staff (CleanS). Scores extended from 0-10 (maximum).
Results: Ten centers in six countries participated in the study (response rate 100%). Two hundred and eleven responses from 68 Surg (32%), 49 ScrubN (23%), 45 Anest (21%), 31 AnesthN (15%), and 18 CleanS (9%) were gathered. Individual uptake of protectionmeasureswas 51.4%, similar among professions and between HIPEC and PIPAC. Perceived levels of protection were 7.57 vs. 7.17 for PIPAC and HIPEC, respectively (p<0.05), with Anesth scoring the lowest (6.81). Perceived contamination risk was 4.19 for HIPEC vs. 3.5 for PIPAC (p<0.01). Information level was lower for CleanS and Anesth for HIPEC and PIPAC procedures compared to all other responders (6.48 vs. 4.86, and 6.48 vs. 5.67, p<0.01). Willingness to obtain more information was 86%, the highest among CleanS (94%).
Conclusions: Experience with the current practice of safety protocols was similar during HIPEC and PIPAC. The individual uptake of protection measures was rather low. The safety perception was better for PIPAC, but the perceived level of protection remained relatively low. The willingness to obtain more information was high. Intensified, standardized training of all OR teammembers involved in HIPEC and PIPAC is meaningful.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
22/02/2021 13:08
Dernière modification de la notice
12/01/2022 8:10
Données d'usage