Outpatient management of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism: A post-hoc analysis from the HOME-PE trial.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6C3D3F32F30A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Outpatient management of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism: A post-hoc analysis from the HOME-PE trial.
Périodique
Thrombosis research
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
HOME-PE study group
ISSN
1879-2472 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0049-3848
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
235
Pages
79-87
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Randomized Controlled Trial ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Cancer-related pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with poor prognosis. Some decision rules identifying patients eligible for home treatment categorize cancer patients at high risk of complications, precluding home treatment. We sought to assess the effectiveness and the safety of outpatient management of patients with low-risk cancer-associated PE.
In the HOME-PE trial, hemodynamically stable patients with symptomatic PE were randomized to either triaging with Hestia criteria or sPESI score. We analyzed 3 groups of low-risk PE patients: 47 with active cancer treated at home (group 1), 691 without active cancer treated at home (group 2), and 33 with active cancer as the only sPESI criterion qualifying them for hospitalization (group 3). The main outcome was the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death within 30 days after randomization.
Patients treated at home had composite outcome rates of 4.3 % (2/47) for those with cancer vs. 1.0 % (7/691) for those without (odds ratio (OR) 4.98, 95%CI 1.15-21.49). Patients with cancer had rates of complications of 4.3 % when treated at home vs. 3.0 % (1/33) when hospitalized (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15-9.47). In multivariable analysis, active cancer was associated with an increased risk of complications for patients treated at home (OR 7.95; 95%CI 1.48-42.82). For patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with the primary outcome (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15-9.74).
Among patients treated at home, active cancer was a risk factor for complications, but among patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with adverse outcomes.
In the HOME-PE trial, hemodynamically stable patients with symptomatic PE were randomized to either triaging with Hestia criteria or sPESI score. We analyzed 3 groups of low-risk PE patients: 47 with active cancer treated at home (group 1), 691 without active cancer treated at home (group 2), and 33 with active cancer as the only sPESI criterion qualifying them for hospitalization (group 3). The main outcome was the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death within 30 days after randomization.
Patients treated at home had composite outcome rates of 4.3 % (2/47) for those with cancer vs. 1.0 % (7/691) for those without (odds ratio (OR) 4.98, 95%CI 1.15-21.49). Patients with cancer had rates of complications of 4.3 % when treated at home vs. 3.0 % (1/33) when hospitalized (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15-9.47). In multivariable analysis, active cancer was associated with an increased risk of complications for patients treated at home (OR 7.95; 95%CI 1.48-42.82). For patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with the primary outcome (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15-9.74).
Among patients treated at home, active cancer was a risk factor for complications, but among patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with adverse outcomes.
Mots-clé
Humans, Outpatients, Pulmonary Embolism/complications, Pulmonary Embolism/therapy, Ambulatory Care, Risk Factors, Neoplasms/complications, Neoplasms/therapy, Outpatient treatment, Prognosis, Pulmonary embolism, cancer
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
09/02/2024 13:07
Dernière modification de la notice
06/04/2024 6:23