Impact of case management on frequent users' quality of life: a randomized, controlled trial (FM 286)

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_6B9B0E1CC1BB
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Abstract (résumé de présentation): article court qui reprend les éléments essentiels présentés à l'occasion d'une conférence scientifique dans un poster ou lors d'une intervention orale.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Impact of case management on frequent users' quality of life: a randomized, controlled trial (FM 286)
Titre de la conférence
Praxis
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Iglesias K. (co-premier), Moschetti K., Baggio S., Velonaki V., Ruggeri O., Hugli O., Burnand B., Wasserfallen J.-B., Daeppen J.-B., Bodenmann P. (co-dernier)
Organisation
83. Jahresversammlung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine Innere Medizin (SGIM)/83e assemblée annuelle de la Société Suisse de Médecine Interne Générale (SSMI), 20.-22. Mai 2015 Congress Center Basel
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Volume
104
Pages
45-46
Langue
anglais
Notes
Communications libres FM 286
Résumé
Introduction: Frequent emergency department (ED) users are often vulnerable patients with many risk factors affecting their quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to examine to what extent a case management intervention improved frequent ED users' QoL.
Methods: Data were part of a randomized, controlled trial designed to improve frequent ED users' QoL at the Lausanne University Hospital. A total of 194 frequent ED users (≥ 5 attendances during the previous 12 months; ≥ 18 years of age) were randomly assigned to the control or the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group received a case management intervention (i.e. counseling and assistance concerning social determinants of health, substance-use disorders, and access to the health-care system). QoL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline and twelve months later. Four dimensions of QoL were retained: physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment, with scores ranging from 0 (low QoL) to 100 (high QoL).
Création de la notice
01/09/2015 8:50
Dernière modification de la notice
22/07/2021 5:36
Données d'usage