Diagnostic performance of ⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_6B77153A18FB
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Diagnostic performance of ⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Périodique
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Besson F.L., Parienti J.J., Bienvenu B., Prior J.O., Costo S., Bouvard G., Agostini D.
ISSN
1619-7089 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1619-7070
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
38
Numéro
9
Pages
1764-1772
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-AnalysisPublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and perform a meta-analysis on the diagnostic performances of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) for giant cell arteritis (GCA), with or without polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles in English that evaluated FDG PET in GCA or PMR. All complete studies were reviewed and qualitatively analysed. Studies that fulfilled the three following criteria were included in a meta-analysis: (1) FDG PET used as a diagnostic tool for GCA and PMR; (2) American College of Rheumatology and Healey criteria used as the reference standard for the diagnosis of GCA and PMR, respectively; and (3) the use of a control group.
RESULTS: We found 14 complete articles. A smooth linear or long segmental pattern of FDG uptake in the aorta and its main branches seems to be a characteristic pattern of GCA. Vessel uptake that was superior to liver uptake was considered an efficient marker for vasculitis. The meta-analysis of six selected studies (101 vasculitis and 182 controls) provided the following results: sensitivity 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.91], specificity 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-0.94), positive predictive value 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), negative predictive value 0.88 (95% CI 0.72-0.95), positive likelihood ratio 6.73 (95% CI 3.55-12.77), negative likelihood ratio 0.25 (95% CI 0.13-0.46) and accuracy 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.90).
CONCLUSION: We found overall valuable diagnostic performances for FDG PET against reference criteria. Standardized FDG uptake criteria are needed to optimize these diagnostic performances.
Mots-clé
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/diagnostic use, Giant Cell Arteritis/complications, Giant Cell Arteritis/radionuclide imaging, Humans, Polymyalgia Rheumatica/complications, Positron-Emission Tomography/methods
Pubmed
Création de la notice
23/10/2012 9:48
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:25
Données d'usage