Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_6B5991368DD2
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.
Périodique
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rodriguez-Falces J., Place N.
ISSN
1439-6327 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1439-6319
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
113
Numéro
12
Pages
3069-3077
Langue
anglais
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: To investigate potential differences in the recruitment order of motor units (MUs) in the quadriceps femoris when electrical stimulation is applied over the quadriceps belly versus the femoral nerve.
METHODS: M-waves and mechanical twitches were evoked using femoral nerve stimulation and direct quadriceps stimulation of gradually increasing intensity from 20 young, healthy subjects. Recruitment order was investigated by analysing the time-to-peak twitch and the time interval from the stimulus artefact to the M-wave positive peak (M-wave latency) for the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles.
RESULTS: During femoral nerve stimulation, time-to-peak twitch and M-wave latency decreased consistently (P < 0.05) with increasing stimulus intensity, whereas, during graded direct quadriceps stimulation, time-to-peak twitch and VL M-wave latency did not show a clear trend (P > 0.05). For the VM muscle, M-wave latency decreased with increasing stimulation level for both femoral nerve and direct quadriceps stimulation, whereas, for the VL muscle, the variation of M-wave latency with stimulus intensity was different for the two stimulation geometries (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral nerve stimulation activated MUs according to the size principle, whereas the recruitment order during direct quadriceps stimulation was more complex, depending ultimately on the architecture of the peripheral nerve and its terminal branches below the stimulating electrodes for each muscle. For the VM, MUs were orderly recruited for both stimulation geometries, whereas, for the VL muscle, MUs were orderly recruited for femoral nerve stimulation, but followed no particular order for direct quadriceps stimulation.
Mots-clé
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation, Femoral nerve stimulation, Direct quadriceps stimulation, Motor unit recruitment order, Time-to-peak twitch, M-wave latency
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
04/02/2014 14:35
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:25
Données d'usage