Le diagnostic de malaria au cabinet: comment gérer t'incertitude [Diagnosis of malaria in general practice: dealing with uncertainty].

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_68E79B294E76
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Le diagnostic de malaria au cabinet: comment gérer t'incertitude [Diagnosis of malaria in general practice: dealing with uncertainty].
Périodique
Revue Médicale Suisse
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Genton B., D'Acremont V.
ISSN
1660-9379 (Print)
ISSN-L
1660-9379
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2005
Volume
1
Numéro
19
Pages
1284-1289
Langue
français
Notes
Publication types: English Abstract ; Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Malaria is the disease to exclude when dealing with a patient coming back from an endemic area with fever. We need reliable diagnostic tools with negative likelihood ratio (LR-) close to zero (-> high negative predictive value). Ideally, a microscopical examination (ME) (thick and thin film) should be done, with or without a rapid diagnostic test (RDT). When the ME is not immediately available, an RDT can be done in the practice office and the ME delayed for 6-12 hours, provided there is no danger sign or thrombopenia. Indeed, the LR- of RDT being of 0.08 (estimated in a meta-analysis of RDT in non-immune travelers), the probability of falciparum malaria is 1% after a negative RDT. When the RDT is positive, the patient should always be treated with an anti-malarial, even if the ME is negative.
Mots-clé
Decision Trees, Endemic Diseases, Family Practice, Humans, Malaria/diagnosis, Travel
Pubmed
Création de la notice
28/01/2008 12:48
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:24
Données d'usage