Descriptive and Content Analysis of Questionnaires Used to Assess Evidence-Based Practice Among Dietitians: A Systematic Review.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_67D8BCEB400E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Descriptive and Content Analysis of Questionnaires Used to Assess Evidence-Based Practice Among Dietitians: A Systematic Review.
Périodique
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Soguel L., Lapointe A., Burnand B., Desroches S.
ISSN
2212-2672 (Print)
ISSN-L
2212-2672
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
124
Numéro
1
Pages
80-101
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Systematic Review ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is described as the integration of the following 3 main dimensions in health professionals' decision making: best currently available research evidence, professional expertise, and patient's values and circumstances. Barriers to EBP at an individual level have been assessed using questionnaires. Knowing which EBP dimensions are actually explored in these questionnaires is essential to promote EBP and its adoption.
The aim of this review was to identify and describe questionnaires that have been used among dietitians to evaluate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and/or behaviors related to EBP, and to perform a content analysis of these, drawn on the EBP dimensions explored.
Questionnaires were identified through a systematic review in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (last search was November 2022). Eligibility criteria were studies using, evaluating, or developing questionnaires meant to evaluate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and/or behaviors related to EBP among dietitians. The content analysis was conducted to identify the EBP dimensions explored (ie, research evidence, professional expertise, and/or patient's values and circumstances). Questionnaire items were categorized as follows: 1 sole EBP dimension, a combination of dimensions, or no identifiable dimension.
Thirty reports (25 studies) were included. The analysis of the 847 items extracted from the 25 questionnaires used showed that the main EBP dimension explored was the integration of research evidence into decision making, found in 75% of items, solely or in combination with another dimension. Professional expertise was explored in 18% of the items, patient's values and circumstances were found in 3%, and the combination of these 3 dimensions was found in <1%.
The important imbalance of explored EBP dimensions in the questionnaires used may lead to a partial and misleading evaluation that prevents efficient strategies to foster EBP. There is an important need to develop more integrative and accurate evaluations of EBP targeting dietitians to promote and develop high-quality dietetics practice.
Mots-clé
Humans, Nutritionists, Evidence-Based Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Dietetics, Clinical Competence, Attitude of Health Personnel, Content analysis, EBP, Evidence-based dietetic practice, Evidence-based practice dimensions, Questionnaire, Systematic review
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
12/09/2023 8:58
Dernière modification de la notice
27/01/2024 7:36
Données d'usage