Short-term postoperative outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are equivalent.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6508C22E13F4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Short-term postoperative outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are equivalent.
Périodique
Techniques in coloproctology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Lightner A.L., Grass F., McKenna N.P., Tilman M., Alsughayer A., Kelley S.R., Behm K., Merchea A., Larson D.W.
ISSN
1128-045X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1123-6337
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
23
Numéro
3
Pages
259-266
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Minimally invasive approaches have become the standard of care for ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA). There are few reports comparing outcomes following a laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Our aim was to determine if there were any differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes following IPAA performed laparoscopically versus robotically.
A retrospective chart review of all laparoscopic and robotic IPAA performed between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018 was carried out. Patients included were adult patients who underwent a proctectomy and IPAA utilizing either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Data collected included patient demographics, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative outcomes.
A total of 132 patients had a minimally invasive IPAA; 58 were performed laparoscopically and 74 robotically. Less than half the patients were female (n = 55; 41.7%) with a median age of 37 years (range 18-68 years). The majority of patients had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (n = 103; 78.0%) with medically refractory disease (n = 87; 65.9%). A greater proportion of patients in the laparoscopic cohort had a prolonged length of stay (n = 27; 46.6% versus n = 18; 24.3%; p < 0.001) and a two-stage approach (n = 56; 96.6% versus n = 37; 50%; p < 0.001), but there were no differences in the rates between the laparoscopic versus robotic cohorts of superficial surgical site infection (6.9% versus 6.8%; p = 0.99), peripouch abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), anastomotic leak (6.9% versus 2.7%; p = 0.21), pelvic abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), and pelvic sepsis (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), readmission (24.1% versus 17.6%; p = 0.35) or reoperation (6.9% versus 5.4%; p = 0.72). On multivariable analysis, only male sex remained predictive of prolonged length of stay, and a robotic approach trended toward a decreased rate of prolonged length of stay.
Laparoscopic and robotic IPAA have equivalent postoperative morbidity underscoring the safety of the continued expansion of the robotic platform for pouch surgery.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Proctocolectomy, Restorative/methods, Retrospective Studies, Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods, Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, Minimally invasive surgery, Proctocolectomy, Restorative, Robotic surgical procedures
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
29/11/2021 15:01
Dernière modification de la notice
13/06/2023 6:58
Données d'usage