Validation of the english version of the Multidimensional Mentalizing Questionnaire (MMQ).

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Mentalization s40359-024-01837-z.pdf (1866.03 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_64DD0F538775
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Validation of the english version of the Multidimensional Mentalizing Questionnaire (MMQ).
Périodique
BMC psychology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Vera Cruz G., Rochat L., Liberacka-Dwojak M., Wiłkość-Dębczyńska M., Khan R., Khazaal Y.
ISSN
2050-7283 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2050-7283
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/06/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
1
Pages
344
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Validation Study
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Mentalizing refers to the ability to understand one's own and others' mental states. Mentalizing is considered a key component of social cognition and healthy personality development. A multinational assessment tools able to appraise the multidimensional and multifaceted aspects of this complex construct are needed.
The present study had two aims: (a) validate an English version of the Multidimensional Mentalizing Questionnaire (MMQ, 33 items) which was designed to assess mentalizing based on an integrated and multilevel model of mentalizing; (b) explore the correlational relationships between the six dimensions of the MMQ and a set of sociodemographic, psycho-cognitive, mental health, and socio-functional variables.
Overall, 1823 individuals (age: 19-76 years old [M = 45; SD = 16]; sex: male = 48.51%, female = 50.57%, non-binary = 0.9%) participated in an online survey. While the participants came from 77 different countries, most of them were residents in UK and USA (95%). Data analytics include confirmatory factorial analysis and Pearson correlations.
The CFA results validated the factorial structure of a 28-items MMQ-English version, with acceptable goodness of fit indices. Regarding the psychometric properties, the MMQ-English version showed good internal reliability and significant positive correlation with another scale designed to assess an analogue construct showing a fair convergent validity. The findings indicated that males, individuals with lower levels of education, lower socio-economic status, depressed, and with a higher score of loneliness are significantly more likely to report poor mentalizing compared with females, individuals with higher education level, greater SES, happier, and with lower scores of loneliness.
The present study validated the English version of the MMQ.
Mots-clé
Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Aged, Psychometrics/instrumentation, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires/standards, Young Adult, Mentalization, Cognition, Loneliness, Mentalizing, Mood, Social functioning
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
14/06/2024 15:27
Dernière modification de la notice
27/07/2024 6:00
Données d'usage