Randomized controlled trial comparing the combination of a polymeric membrane dressing plus negative pressure wound therapy against negative pressure wound therapy alone: The WICVAC study.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_6422B9B74387
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Randomized controlled trial comparing the combination of a polymeric membrane dressing plus negative pressure wound therapy against negative pressure wound therapy alone: The WICVAC study.
Périodique
Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Skrinjar E., Duschek N., Bayer G.S., Assadian O., Koulas S., Hirsch K., Basic J., Assadian A.
ISSN
1524-475X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1067-1927
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
24
Numéro
5
Pages
928-935
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is the treatment of choice for chronic wounds; yet, it is associated with considerable workload. Prompted by its nonadhesive and wound-healing properties, this study investigated the effect of an additional polymeric membrane interface dressing (PMD; PolyMem WIC) in NPWT. From October 2011 to April 2013, 60 consecutive patients with chronic leg wounds or surgical site infections after revascularization of lower extremities were randomly allocated to either treatment with conventional NPWT (control arm) or NPWT with an additional PMD (intervention arm). The primary outcome was wound healing achieved within 30 days, the secondary endpoints included: number of days between dressing changes, wound-related pain, cost efficiency, and occurrence of adverse events (ClinTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02399722). Forty-seven patients completed follow-up. No difference in wound healing was observed (p > 0.05) between both study arms. The additional PMD allowed significantly longer wearing times (days) between dressing changes (intervention: 8.8 ± 0.5, control: 4.8 ± 0.2; p < 0.001). Pain was slightly higher in patients randomized to NPWT alone (VAS score: 4.8 ± 2.9) compared to NPWT + PMD (VAS score: 3.0 ± 2.9, p = 0.063). No wound infections were observed. Costs were reduced by 34% per patient in the intervention arm. These results suggest that the combination of NPWT and an additional interface PMD is a safe and economic method for the treatment of chronic wounds, which requires significantly fewer dressing changes for a comparable wound healing.

Pubmed
Création de la notice
24/06/2016 9:38
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:20
Données d'usage