Under what conditions? Therapist and client characteristics moderate the role of change talk in brief motivational intervention.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Document(s) secondaire(s)
Télécharger: 5_26727413_Postprint.pdf (694.02 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_5DF7E1FA0831
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Under what conditions? Therapist and client characteristics moderate the role of change talk in brief motivational intervention.
Périodique
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Gaume J., Longabaugh R., Magill M., Bertholet N., Gmel G., Daeppen J.B.
ISSN
1939-2117 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0022-006X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
84
Numéro
3
Pages
211-220
Langue
anglais
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Client change talk has been proposed as a mechanism of change in motivational interviewing (MI) by mediating the link between therapist MI-consistent behaviors (MICO) and client behavioral outcomes. We tested under what circumstances this mechanism was supported in the context of a clinical trial of brief MI for heavy drinking among nontreatment seeking young men.
METHOD: We conducted psycholinguistic coding of 174 sessions using the MI Skill Code 2.1 and derived the frequency of MICO and the strength of change talk (CTS) averaged over the session. CTS was examined as a mediator of the relationship between MICO and a drinking composite score measured at 3-month follow-up, controlling for the composite measure at baseline. Finally, we tested therapist gender and MI experience as well as client readiness to change and alcohol problem severity as moderators of this mediation model.
RESULTS: CTS significantly predicted outcome (higher strength related to less drinking), but MICO did not predict CTS. However, CTS mediated the relationship between MICO and drinking outcomes when therapists had more experience in MI and when clients had more severe alcohol problems (i.e., significant conditional indirect effects).
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism hypothesized by MI theory was operative in our brief MI with heavy drinking young men, but only under particular conditions. Our results suggest that attention should be paid to therapist selection, training, and/or supervision until they reach a certain level of competence, and that MI might not be appropriate for nontreatment seeking clients drinking at a lower level of risk. (PsycINFO Database Record
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
15/02/2016 13:39
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:16
Données d'usage