Determining the best population-level alcohol consumption model and its impact on estimates of alcohol-attributable harms.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_5BFA809E5A33.P001.pdf (803.72 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_5BFA809E5A33
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Determining the best population-level alcohol consumption model and its impact on estimates of alcohol-attributable harms.
Périodique
Population Health Metrics
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Kehoe T., Gmel G., Shield K.D., Gmel G., Rehm J.
ISSN
1478-7954 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1478-7954
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Volume
10
Numéro
6
Pages
6
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The goals of our study are to determine the most appropriate model for alcohol consumption as an exposure for burden of disease, to analyze the effect of the chosen alcohol consumption distribution on the estimation of the alcohol Population- Attributable Fractions (PAFs), and to characterize the chosen alcohol consumption distribution by exploring if there is a global relationship within the distribution.
METHODS: To identify the best model, the Log-Normal, Gamma, and Weibull prevalence distributions were examined using data from 41 surveys from Gender, Alcohol and Culture: An International Study (GENACIS) and from the European Comparative Alcohol Study. To assess the effect of these distributions on the estimated alcohol PAFs, we calculated the alcohol PAF for diabetes, breast cancer, and pancreatitis using the three above-named distributions and using the more traditional approach based on categories. The relationship between the mean and the standard deviation from the Gamma distribution was estimated using data from 851 datasets for 66 countries from GENACIS and from the STEPwise approach to Surveillance from the World Health Organization.
RESULTS: The Log-Normal distribution provided a poor fit for the survey data, with Gamma and Weibull distributions providing better fits. Additionally, our analyses showed that there were no marked differences for the alcohol PAF estimates based on the Gamma or Weibull distributions compared to PAFs based on categorical alcohol consumption estimates. The standard deviation of the alcohol distribution was highly dependent on the mean, with a unit increase in alcohol consumption associated with a unit increase in the mean of 1.258 (95% CI: 1.223 to 1.293) (R2 = 0.9207) for women and 1.171 (95% CI: 1.144 to 1.197) (R2 = 0. 9474) for men.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the Gamma distribution and the Weibull distribution provided similar results, the Gamma distribution is recommended to model alcohol consumption from population surveys due to its fit, flexibility, and the ease with which it can be modified. The results showed that a large degree of variance of the standard deviation of the alcohol consumption Gamma distribution was explained by the mean alcohol consumption, allowing for alcohol consumption to be modeled through a Gamma distribution using only average consumption.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
09/06/2012 19:18
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:14
Données d'usage