Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 37293810_BIB_5BCD830A5CA4.pdf (4113.40 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_5BCD830A5CA4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Périodique
International wound journal
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Probst S., Saini C., Gschwind G., Stefanelli A., Bobbink P., Pugliese M.T., Cekic S., Pastor D., Gethin G.
ISSN
1742-481X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1742-4801
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
20
Numéro
9
Pages
3906-3921
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Systematic Review ; Meta-Analysis ; Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Venous leg ulcers (VLU) represent a major public health challenge. Little is known about the prevalence and incidence of VLU internationally. Published studies are usually reporting different estimates because of disparities in study designs and measurement methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to identify the prevalence and incidence of VLU internationally and to characterise the population as reported in these studies. Studies were identified from searches in Medline (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LiSSa (Littérature Scientifique en Santé), Google Scholar and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to November 2022. Studies were included if their primary outcomes were reported as a period prevalence or point prevalence or cumulative incidence or incidence VLU rate. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 10 reporting estimates of prevalence, three reporting both prevalence and incidence estimates and one incidence. All were included in meta-analyses. The results show a pooled prevalence of 0.32% and a pooled incidence of 0.17%. Our results highlighted an extreme heterogeneity across effect sizes for both prevalence and incidence, which prevent a meaningful interpretation of pooled indexes and argue for further studies with specific prevalence-type reported and target population under study.
Mots-clé
Humans, Prevalence, Incidence, Varicose Ulcer/epidemiology, incidence, meta-analysis, prevalence, systematic review, venous leg ulcer
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
14/06/2023 9:52
Dernière modification de la notice
09/08/2024 14:59
Données d'usage