Are mind-body therapies effective for relieving cancer-related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Détails
Télécharger: 34545984_BIB_5953C50D4353.pdf (1118.72 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_5953C50D4353
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Are mind-body therapies effective for relieving cancer-related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Périodique
Psycho-oncology
ISSN
1099-1611 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1057-9249
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
31
Numéro
3
Pages
345-371
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To assess whether mind-body therapies are effective for relieving cancer-related pain in adults, since at least one-third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain.
We searched for all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer-related pain who were treated with mind-body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias.
We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta-analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of -0.39 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I <sup>2</sup> = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four "outlier" studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality.
Mind-body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high-quality clinical trials.
We searched for all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer-related pain who were treated with mind-body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias.
We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta-analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of -0.39 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I <sup>2</sup> = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four "outlier" studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality.
Mind-body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high-quality clinical trials.
Mots-clé
Adult, Cancer Pain/therapy, Humans, Hypnosis, Meditation, Mindfulness, Neoplasms/complications, Neoplasms/therapy, Yoga, Psycho-Oncology, adults, cancer, mind-body therapies, oncology, pain
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
27/09/2021 8:58
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2024 7:36