Expert consensus on neurodevelopmental outcomes in pregnancy pharmacovigilance studies.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 37332344_BIB_592B66437582.pdf (953.30 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_592B66437582
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Expert consensus on neurodevelopmental outcomes in pregnancy pharmacovigilance studies.
Périodique
Frontiers in pharmacology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bromley R.L., Bickle Graz M., Bluett-Duncan M., Chambers C., Damkier P., Dietrich K., Dolk H., Grant K., Mattson S., Meador K.J., Nordeng H., Oberlander T.F., Ornoy A., Revet A., Richardson J., Rovet J., Schuler-Faccini L., Smearman E., Simms V., Vorhees C., Wide K., Wood A., Yates L., Ystrom E., Supraja T.A., Adams J.
ISSN
1663-9812 (Print)
ISSN-L
1663-9812
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
06/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Pages
1094698
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Background: Exposure in utero to certain medications can disrupt processes of fetal development, including brain development, leading to a continuum of neurodevelopmental difficulties. Recognizing the deficiency of neurodevelopmental investigations within pregnancy pharmacovigilance, an international Neurodevelopmental Expert Working Group was convened to achieve consensus regarding the core neurodevelopmental outcomes, optimization of methodological approaches and barriers to conducting pregnancy pharmacovigilance studies with neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods: A modified Delphi study was undertaken based on stakeholder and expert input. Stakeholders (patient, pharmaceutical, academic and regulatory) were invited to define topics, pertaining to neurodevelopmental investigations in medication-exposed pregnancies. Experts were identified for their experience regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes following medicinal, substances of misuse or environmental exposures in utero. Two questionnaire rounds and a virtual discussion meeting were used to explore expert opinion on the topics identified by the stakeholders. Results: Twenty-five experts, from 13 countries and professionally diverse backgrounds took part in the development of 11 recommendations. The recommendations focus on the importance of neurodevelopment as a core feature of pregnancy pharmacovigilance, the timing of study initiation and a core set of distinct but interrelated neurodevelopmental skills or diagnoses which require investigation. Studies should start in infancy with an extended period of investigation into adolescence, with more frequent sampling during rapid periods of development. Additionally, recommendations are made regarding optimal approach to neurodevelopmental outcome measurement, comparator groups, exposure factors, a core set of confounding and mediating variables, attrition, reporting of results and the required improvements in funding for potential later emerging effects. Different study designs will be required depending on the specific neurodevelopmental outcome type under investigation and whether the medicine in question is newly approved or already in widespread use. Conclusion: An improved focus on neurodevelopmental outcomes is required within pregnancy pharmacovigilance. These expert recommendations should be met across a complementary set of studies which converge to form a comprehensive set of evidence regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes in pregnancy pharmacovigilance.
Mots-clé
in utero exposure, medicines, neurobehavior, neurodevelopment, pharmacovigilance, pregnancy, teratogens
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
23/06/2023 9:53
Dernière modification de la notice
23/01/2024 8:26
Données d'usage