Stimulation cardiaque. Extraction percutanee de sondes infectees. [Cardiac pacing. Percutaneous extraction of infected pacing catheter]

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_581CFEEAB63F
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Stimulation cardiaque. Extraction percutanee de sondes infectees. [Cardiac pacing. Percutaneous extraction of infected pacing catheter]
Périodique
Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Girod  G., Fromer  M., Schlapfer  J., Kappenberger  L.
ISSN
0003-9683 (Print)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/1999
Volume
92
Numéro
11
Pages
1479-84
Notes
English Abstract
Journal Article --- Old month value: Nov
Résumé
Infection of a cardiac pacemaker is a rare but serious complication. Percutaneous ablation of the pacemaker and pacing catheter is the only effective treatment. Techniques of extraction of pacing systems have been evaluated but the long term results require analysis. Eighteen patients with infection of cardiac pacemakers underwent extraction of one or more pacing catheters (14 atrial and 20 ventricular) in one same centre. The indication was infection of the pacemaker unit (12 cases) or septicaemia (6 cases) The causal organism was a staphylococcus (aureus: 7 cases, epidermidis: 10 cases, capitis: 1 case). Three techniques were used: 1) direct external manual traction, 2) internal traction with several devices, 3) endovascular counter-traction (Byrd-Cook system). The time from primary implantation of the pacing catheter to its extraction was 42 months and from last pacemaker manipulation to infection, 23 months. The average duration of the extraction procedure was 120 +/- 45 minutes; that of fluoroscopy was 10 +/- 6 minutes. The first technique was used 12 times, the second 8 times and the third 14 times, with complete extraction of the catheter in 88.2% of cases. The metallic tip of the distal electrode embolised in 2 cases and remained stuck in the right ventricle in 1 case. Only one pacing catheter was abandoned. After an average follow-up of 45 months, none of the patients had recurrent infection or any other complication. The authors conclude that extraction of infected pacing catheters is safe and effective. It is the treatment of choice of this complication.
Mots-clé
Aged Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/*adverse effects Female Heart Catheterization/adverse effects Humans Male Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects/*microbiology Prosthesis-Related Infections/*etiology/therapy Recurrence Sepsis/etiology Staphylococcal Infections/*etiology/therapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
15/02/2008 12:29
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:11
Données d'usage