Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (318.00 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_57DC66E09657
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM.
Périodique
Intensive Care Medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Claassen J., Taccone F.S., Horn P., Holtkamp M., Stocchetti N., Oddo M.
ISSN
1432-1238 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0342-4642
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
39
Numéro
8
Pages
1337-1351
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: Recommendations for EEG monitoring in the ICU are lacking. The Neurointensive Care Section of the ESICM assembled a multidisciplinary group to establish consensus recommendations on the use of EEG in the ICU.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed and 42 studies were included. Data were extracted using the PICO approach, including: (a) population, i.e. ICU patients with at least one of the following: traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, stroke, coma after cardiac arrest, septic and metabolic encephalopathy, encephalitis, and status epilepticus; (b) intervention, i.e. EEG monitoring of at least 30 min duration; (c) control, i.e. intermittent vs. continuous EEG, as no studies compared patients with a specific clinical condition, with and without EEG monitoring; (d) outcome endpoints, i.e. seizure detection, ischemia detection, and prognostication. After selection, evidence was classified and recommendations developed using the GRADE system.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The panel recommends EEG in generalized convulsive status epilepticus and to rule out nonconvulsive seizures in brain-injured patients and in comatose ICU patients without primary brain injury who have unexplained and persistent altered consciousness. We suggest EEG to detect ischemia in comatose patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and to improve prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest. We recommend continuous over intermittent EEG for refractory status epilepticus and suggest it for patients with status epilepticus and suspected ongoing seizures and for comatose patients with unexplained and persistent altered consciousness.
CONCLUSIONS: EEG monitoring is an important diagnostic tool for specific indications. Further data are necessary to understand its potential for ischemia assessment and coma prognostication.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
18/08/2013 9:19
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 8:55
Données d'usage