Comparison of antibiotic drops placed in the conjunctival cul-de-sac to antibiotic ointment applied to the lid margin in reduction of bacterial colonization on the lid margin.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_56D4B3139069
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of antibiotic drops placed in the conjunctival cul-de-sac to antibiotic ointment applied to the lid margin in reduction of bacterial colonization on the lid margin.
Périodique
Cornea
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Hashemi K., Chuang A.Z., Schweitzer C., Lanier J.D.
ISSN
0277-3740 (Print)
ISSN-L
0277-3740
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2000
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Numéro
4
Pages
459-463
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of antibiotic drops placed in the conjunctival cul-de-sac to antibiotic ointment applied to the lid margin in reduction of bacterial colonization on the lid margin.
METHODS: A randomized, prospective, single-masked study was conducted on 19 patients with culture-proven colonization of bacteria on the lid margins. Ophthalmic eligibility criteria included the presence of > or =50 colony-forming units/mL (CFU/mL) of bacteria on both right and left lids. Each patient received one drop of ofloxacin in one eye every night for one week, followed by one drop once a week for one month. In the same manner, each patient received bacitracin ointment (erythromycin or gentamicin ointment if lid margin bacteria were resistant to bacitracin) to the lid margin of the fellow eye. Quantitative lid cultures were taken at initial visit, one week, one month, and two months. Fifteen volunteers (30 lids) served as controls. Lid cultures were taken at initial visit, one week, and one month.
RESULTS: Both antibiotic drop and ointment reduced average bacterial CFU/mL at one week and one month. Average bacterial CFU/mL reestablished to baseline values at two months. There was no statistically significant difference between antibiotic drop and ointment in reducing bacterial colonization on the lid margin.
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic drops placed in the conjunctival cul-de-sac appear to be as effective as ointment applied to the lid margins in reducing bacterial colonization in patients with > or =50 CFU/mL of bacteria on the lid margins.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage, Bacitracin/administration & dosage, Bacteria/isolation & purification, Colony Count, Microbial, Conjunctiva/drug effects, Conjunctiva/microbiology, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Erythromycin/administration & dosage, Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy, Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology, Eyelid Diseases/drug therapy, Eyelid Diseases/microbiology, Eyelids/drug effects, Eyelids/microbiology, Female, Gentamicins/administration & dosage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ofloxacin/administration & dosage, Ointments, Ophthalmic Solutions, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
05/03/2013 16:27
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:11
Données d'usage