Assessing medication adherence: options to consider.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_55E35811C0A7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Assessing medication adherence: options to consider.
Périodique
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Lehmann A., Aslani P., Ahmed R., Celio J., Gauchet A., Bedouch P., Bugnon O., Allenet B., Schneider M.P.
ISSN
2210-7711 (Electronic)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Volume
36
Numéro
1
Pages
55-69
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublishDocument Type: Review
Résumé
Background Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There are many measures available to assess patient medication adherence. Aim of the review This review aims to present the commonly used indirect methods available for measuring medication adherence in routine healthcare and research studies. Method A literature review on medication adherence measures in patient populations with chronic conditions taking chronic medications was conducted through Medline (2003-2013). A complementary manual search of references cited in the retrieved studies was performed in order to identify any additional studies. Results Of the 238 initial Medline search results, 57 full texts were retrieved. Forty-seven articles were included as a result of the manual search. Adherence measures identified were: self-report (reported in 50 publications), electronic measures (33), pharmacy refills and claims data (26) and pill counts (25). Patient self-report, electronic measures, pharmacy refill and claims data were the most commonly used measures of adherence in research, routine practice, epidemiological and intervention studies. These methods, and their strengths and limitations have been described in this paper. Conclusion A multitude of indirect measures of adherence exist in the literature, however, there is no "gold" standard for measuring adherence to medications. Triangulation of methods increases the validity and reliability of the adherence data collected. To strengthen the adherence data collected and allow for comparison of data, future research and practice interventions should use an internationally accepted, operational standardized definition of medication adherence and clearly describe the medication adherence methods used.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/02/2014 19:16
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:10
Données d'usage