How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 31331381_BIB_5125CE42B305.pdf (631.93 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_5125CE42B305
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol.
Périodique
Systematic reviews
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rapin J., Pellet J., Mabire C., Gendron S., Dubois C.A.
ISSN
2046-4053 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2046-4053
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
22/07/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
8
Numéro
1
Pages
182
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Nursing care quality varies between hospitals, and even between departments within the same institution. Suboptimal care can have deleterious consequences for patients such as lengthened hospital stay, nosocomial infection, pressure ulcers or death. Experts recommend the implementation of nursing performance improvement systems to assess team performance and monitor patient outcomes and efficiency savings. In practice, these systems are expected to include feedback processes directed towards nursing teams and interprofessional staff in order to facilitate adjustments and improve their performance. Unfortunately, feedback appears somewhat haphazard and, at times, overlooked. This could be explained by an ongoing absence of clear recommendations. As a result, feedback effects are inconclusive: some teams improve their practice, others do not. Although feedback has been conceptualised and studied from different theoretical perspectives, ongoing empirical inconsistencies remain unexplained. The goal of this rapid realist review protocol is to develop a theory that explains how feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems.
This study follows standard guidelines established for realist reviews. Mechanisms at work will be analysed using Actor-Network Theory. All scientific documents are selected from five databases, are published in both English and French between 2010 and 2018, and include empirical research, reviews and grey literature. First, selection of documents will proceed on the basis of titles and abstracts; followed by a second selection by reading the remaining full texts. Inclusion criteria and a data extraction form will be pilot tested with 40 articles prior to completion by two reviewers. Data will be summarised in the form of [context, mechanism, outcome] equations to theorise operational feedback.
The innovative combination of Actor-Network Theory with a realist methodology holds promise for the identification of explanatory equations in complex systems and theory development. A rapid realist review is relevant to address an enduring knowledge gap which requires theory development. This preliminary study lays the groundwork for a pioneering theory on feedback in nursing performance improvement systems that will subsequently inform a multiple case study.
Prospero CRD42018110128.
Mots-clé
Delivery of Health Care/standards, Efficiency, Organizational, Feedback, Humans, Nursing Care/standards, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Care Team/standards, Quality Improvement/standards, Social Theory, Efficiency, Organisational, Nurses, Outcome and process assessment, Health care, Quality improvement, Quality of health care, Review
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
04/08/2019 15:30
Dernière modification de la notice
15/01/2021 8:09
Données d'usage