Can Dopamine Responsiveness Be Predicted in Parkinson's Disease Without an Acute Administration Test?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_49417A60604C
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Can Dopamine Responsiveness Be Predicted in Parkinson's Disease Without an Acute Administration Test?
Périodique
Journal of Parkinson's disease
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Betrouni N., Moreau C., Rolland A.S., Carrière N., Viard R., Lopes R., Kuchcinski G., Eusebio A., Thobois S., Hainque E., Hubsch C., Rascol O., Brefel C., Drapier S., Giordana C., Durif F., Maltête D., Guehl D., Hopes L., Rouaud T., Jarraya B., Benatru I., Tranchant C., Tir M., Chupin M., Bardinet E., Defebvre L., Corvol J.C., Devos D.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
PREDISTIM Study Group
ISSN
1877-718X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1877-7171
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
7
Pages
2179-2190
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Dopamine responsiveness (dopa-sensitivity) is an important parameter in the management of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). For quantification of this parameter, patients undergo a challenge test with acute Levodopa administration after drug withdrawal, which may lead to patient discomfort and use of significant resources.
Our objective was to develop a predictive model combining clinical scores and imaging.
350 patients, recruited by 13 specialist French centers and considered for deep brain stimulation, underwent an acute L-dopa challenge (dopa-sensitivity > 30%), full assessment, and MRI investigations, including T1w and R2* images. Data were randomly divided into a learning base from 10 centers and data from the remaining centers for testing. A machine selection approach was applied to choose the optimal variables and these were then used in regression modeling. Complexity of the modelling was incremental, while the first model considered only clinical variables, the subsequent included imaging features. The performances were evaluated by comparing the estimated values and actual valuesResults:Whatever the model, the variables age, sex, disease duration, and motor scores were selected as contributors. The first model used them and the coefficients of determination (R2) was 0.60 for the testing set and 0.69 in the learning set (p < 0.001). The models that added imaging features enhanced the performances: with T1w (R2 = 0.65 and 0.76, p < 0.001) and with R2* (R2 = 0.60 and 0.72, p < 0.001).
These results suggest that modeling is potentially a simple way to estimate dopa-sensitivity, but requires confirmation in a larger population, including patients with dopa-sensitivity < 30.
Mots-clé
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use, Dopamine, Humans, Levodopa/therapeutic use, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging, Parkinson Disease/drug therapy, MRI, dopa-sensitivity, prediction modelling
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
17/04/2025 11:21
Dernière modification de la notice
18/04/2025 7:05
Données d'usage