Sorting out measures and definitions of screening participation to improve comparability : the example of colorectal cancer.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_4513E8C9D422
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Sorting out measures and definitions of screening participation to improve comparability : the example of colorectal cancer.
Périodique
European Journal of Cancer (oxford, England : 1990)
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bulliard J.L., Garcia M., Blom J., Senore C., Mai V., Klabunde C.
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
50
Numéro
2
Pages
434-446
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish Document Type: Review
Résumé
Participation is a key indicator of the potential effectiveness of any population-based intervention. Defining, measuring and reporting participation in cancer screening programmes has become more heterogeneous as the number and diversity of interventions have increased, and the purposes of this benchmarking parameter have broadened. This study, centred on colorectal cancer, addresses current issues that affect the increasingly complex task of comparing screening participation across settings. Reports from programmes with a defined target population and active invitation scheme, published between 2005 and 2012, were reviewed. Differences in defining and measuring participation were identified and quantified, and participation indicators were grouped by aims of measure and temporal dimensions. We found that consistent terminology, clear and complete reporting of participation definition and systematic documentation of coverage by invitation were lacking. Further, adherence to definitions proposed in the 2010 European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening was suboptimal. Ineligible individuals represented 1% to 15% of invitations, and variable criteria for ineligibility yielded differences in participation estimates that could obscure the interpretation of colorectal cancer screening participation internationally. Excluding ineligible individuals from the reference population enhances comparability of participation measures. Standardised measures of cumulative participation to compare screening protocols with different intervals and inclusion of time since invitation in definitions are urgently needed to improve international comparability of colorectal cancer screening participation. Recommendations to improve comparability of participation indicators in cancer screening interventions are made.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/02/2014 18:38
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:49
Données d'usage