Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_44ED0450ED79
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size
Périodique
Eur Radiol
Auteur(s)
Fallenberg E. M., Dromain C., Diekmann F., Engelken F., Krohn M., Singh J. M., Ingold-Heppner B., Winzer K. J., Bick U., Renz D. M.
ISSN-L
1432-1084 (Electronic)0938-7994 (Linking)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
24
Numéro
1
Pages
256-64
Langue
anglais
Notes
Fallenberg, E MDromain, CDiekmann, FEngelken, FKrohn, MSingh, J MIngold-Heppner, BWinzer, K JBick, URenz, D MengComparative StudyGermany2013/09/21 06:00Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):256-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3007-7. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: To compare mammography (MG), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast cancers using postoperative histology as the gold standard. METHODS: After ethical approval, 80 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent MG, CESM, and MRI examinations. CESM was reviewed by an independent experienced radiologist, and the maximum dimension of suspicious lesions was measured. For MG and MRI, routine clinical reports of breast specialists, with judgment based on the BI-RADS lexicon, were used. Results of each imaging technique were correlated to define the index cancer. Fifty-nine cases could be compared to postoperative histology for size estimation. RESULTS: Breast cancer was visible in 66/80 MG, 80/80 CESM, and 77/79 MRI examinations. Average lesion largest dimension was 27.31 mm (SD 22.18) in MG, 31.62 mm (SD 24.41) in CESM, and 27.72 mm (SD 21.51) in MRI versus 32.51 mm (SD 29.03) in postoperative histology. No significant difference was found between lesion size measurement on MRI and CESM compared with histopathology. CONCLUSION: Our initial results show a better sensitivity of CESM and MRI in breast cancer detection than MG and a good correlation with postoperative histology in size assessment. KEY POINTS: * Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is slowly being introduced into clinical practice. * Access to breast MRI is limited by availability and lack of reimbursement. * Initial results show a better sensitivity of CESM and MRI than conventional mammography. * CESM showed a good correlation with postoperative histology in size assessment. * Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography offers promise, seemingly providing information comparable to MRI.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms/*diagnosis, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/*diagnosis, *Contrast Media, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods, Mammography/*methods, Middle Aged, *Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve
Création de la notice
16/09/2016 10:14
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:49
Données d'usage