Judicialisation and Direct Democracy. Switzerland's Ban on Minaret Construction

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: RFSP_Ban on Minaret Construction.pdf (935.14 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
Document(s) secondaire(s)
Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_44E7A9ECD69E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Judicialisation and Direct Democracy. Switzerland's Ban on Minaret Construction
Périodique
Revue française de science politique (English)
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rayner H., Voutat B.
ISSN-L
1950-6686
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
64
Numéro
4
Pages
689-709
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Launched by representatives from the Union démocratique du centre (UDC) with the aim of circumventing political and judicial decisions made at both local and national levels, the 2009 federal popular initiative calling for a ban on the construction of minarets rekindled the stigmatisation of Muslims living in Switzerland. Within the prevalent institutional configuration it moreover revived controversies surrounding issues such as direct democracy versus fundamental rights, or "the will of the people" versus "the power of the judges", whether national or international. "Judicialisation" is a polysemous concept. It is not understood here as the transfer to the courts of matters of political significance - in this instance the public regulation of religion - but as a process of juridification (or juridicalisation) in which court rulings were constantly anticipated in the political debate provoked by the popular initiative.
Création de la notice
19/10/2015 12:43
Dernière modification de la notice
21/11/2022 8:11
Données d'usage