Physicians approach shared decision-making for sports eligibility decisions heterogeneously.
Détails
Télécharger: 38510500_BIB_43A76B6AB757.pdf (385.36 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_43A76B6AB757
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Physicians approach shared decision-making for sports eligibility decisions heterogeneously.
Périodique
American heart journal plus
ISSN
2666-6022 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2666-6022
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
04/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
40
Pages
100371
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
There is limited data regarding how clinicians operationalize shared decision-making (SDM) with athletes with cardiovascular diagnoses. This study was designed to explore sports cardiologists' conceptions of SDM and approaches to sports eligibility decisions.
20 sports cardiologists were interviewed by telephone or video conference from October 2022 to May 2023. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted with the transcripts.
All participants endorsed SDM for eligibility decisions, however, SDM was defined and operationalized heterogeneously. Only 6 participants specifically referenced eliciting patient preferences during SDM. Participants described variable roles for the physician in SDM and variable views on athletes' understanding, perception, and tolerance of risk. Participants thresholds for prohibitive annual risk of sudden cardiac death ranged from <1 % to >10 %.
These findings reinforce the general acceptance of SDM for sports eligibility decisions and highlight the need to better understand this process and identify the most effective approach for operationalization.
20 sports cardiologists were interviewed by telephone or video conference from October 2022 to May 2023. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted with the transcripts.
All participants endorsed SDM for eligibility decisions, however, SDM was defined and operationalized heterogeneously. Only 6 participants specifically referenced eliciting patient preferences during SDM. Participants described variable roles for the physician in SDM and variable views on athletes' understanding, perception, and tolerance of risk. Participants thresholds for prohibitive annual risk of sudden cardiac death ranged from <1 % to >10 %.
These findings reinforce the general acceptance of SDM for sports eligibility decisions and highlight the need to better understand this process and identify the most effective approach for operationalization.
Mots-clé
Athletes, Cardiologists, Cardiovascular diseases, Return to sport, Shared decision-making, Sports
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/03/2024 11:23
Dernière modification de la notice
09/08/2024 14:58