Spoilt for Choice: A Survey of Current Practices of Surgical Urinary Stone Treatment and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines among Swiss Urologists.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_42E31BF1BF42
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Spoilt for Choice: A Survey of Current Practices of Surgical Urinary Stone Treatment and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines among Swiss Urologists.
Périodique
Urologia internationalis
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Betschart P., Zumstein V., Jichlinski P., Herrmann TRW, Knoll T., Engeler D.S., Müllhaupt G., Schmid H.P., Abt D.
ISSN
1423-0399 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0042-1138
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
103
Numéro
3
Pages
357-363
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Urologists have to master a variety of techniques to be able to offer the most appropriate surgical stone treatment for each individual patient. Therefore, we performed a survey among board-certified Swiss urologists to assess the availability of the different surgical methods, the current practices of surgical treatment of urolithiasis and the adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations in Switzerland.
A 14-question survey assessed the working environment, equipment, perioperative settings and decision trees for specific stone scenarios. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to determine differences between frequencies of answers.
Hundred and five members of Swiss Urology (38%) completed the survey. All treatment modalities are available for the majority of respondents. Ureterorenoscopy was found to have the highest availability (100%) and was the preferred choice in the majority of stone scenarios. A high adherence to the guidelines was found for the treatment of ureteral stones <10 mm (100% proximal and distal), and >10 mm (69% proximal, 94% distal). All respondents answered in accordance with the guidelines regarding the treatment of middle and upper pole stones <10 mm, 10-20 mm and lower pole stones 10-20 mm. Guideline adherence was 99% for lower pole stones <10 mm, 78% for lower pole stones >20 mm, and 63% for middle/upper pole stones >20 mm.
This survey provides a detailed insight into current stone treatment practices in Switzerland. The full spectrum of urinary stone treatment options is available for the majority of Swiss urologists. The choice of treatment shows a high accordance with evidence-based guidelines and a preference for retrograde endoscopic surgery in the majority of stone scenarios.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Evidence-Based Medicine, Female, Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data, Health Care Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Switzerland, Urinary Calculi/surgery, Urology, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Shock-wave lithotripsy, Swiss urology, Treatment, Urinary stone
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
13/09/2019 10:41
Dernière modification de la notice
27/04/2024 6:05
Données d'usage