Adjusting Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) for Level-Specific Differences Reduces FRAX®-Based Treatment Reclassification in Patients with Vertebral Exclusions: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_41B0D9CF871B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Adjusting Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) for Level-Specific Differences Reduces FRAX®-Based Treatment Reclassification in Patients with Vertebral Exclusions: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Périodique
Journal of clinical densitometry
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Leslie W.D., Binkley N., Goel H., Hans D., McCloskey E.V.
ISSN
1094-6950 (Print)
ISSN-L
1094-6950
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Numéro
4
Pages
101429
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a FRAX®-independent risk factor for fracture prediction. TBS values increase from cranial to caudal, with the following mean differences between TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> and individual lumbar vertebrae: L1 -0.093, L2 -0.008, L3 +0.055 and L4 +0.046. Excluding vertebral levels can affect FRAX-based treatment recommendations close to the intervention threshold. We examined the effect of adjusting for level-specific TBS differences in individuals with vertebral exclusions due to structural artifact on TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations. We identified 71,209 individuals aged ≥40 years with TBS and FRAX calculations through the Manitoba Bone Density Program. In the 24,428 individuals with vertebral exclusions, adjusting TBS using these level-specific factors agreed with TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> (mean difference -0.001). We compared FRAX-based treatment recommendations for TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> and for non-excluded vertebral levels before and after adjusting for level-specific TBS differences. Among those with baseline major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥15 %, TBS with vertebral exclusions reclassified FRAX-based treatment in 10.6 % of individuals compared with TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> , and was reduced to 7.2 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. In 11,131 patients where L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting (the most common exclusion pattern with the largest TBS effect), treatment reclassification was reduced from 13.9 % to 2.4 %, respectively. Among individuals with baseline hip fracture risk ≥2 %, TBS vertebral exclusions reclassified 7.1 % compared with TBS <sub>L1-L4</sub> , but only 4.5 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. When L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting, treatment reclassification from hip fracture risk was reduced from 9.2 % to 5.2 %. In conclusion, TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations are affected by vertebral level exclusions for structural artifact. Adjusting for level-specific differences in TBS reduces reclassification in FRAX-based treatment recommendations.
Mots-clé
Humans, Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging, Manitoba/epidemiology, Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology, Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology, Bone Density, Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging, Hip Fractures/etiology, Registries, Absorptiometry, Photon, Risk Assessment, Bone mineral density, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, FRAX, Osteoporosis, Trabecular bone score
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
29/09/2023 14:02
Dernière modification de la notice
19/12/2023 7:15
Données d'usage