Filling the knowledge gap: Scoping review regarding sampling methods, assays, and further requirements to assess airborne viruses.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_4000E7FFD485
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Filling the knowledge gap: Scoping review regarding sampling methods, assays, and further requirements to assess airborne viruses.
Périodique
The Science of the total environment
ISSN
1879-1026 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0048-9697
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
10/10/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
946
Pages
174016
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Assessment of occupational exposure to viruses is crucial to identify virus reservoirs and sources of dissemination at an early stage and to help prevent spread between employees and to the general population. Measuring workers' exposure can facilitate assessment of the effectiveness of protective and mitigation measures in place. The aim of this scoping review is to give an overview of available methods and those already implemented for airborne virus' exposure assessment in different occupational and indoor environments. The results retrieved from the different studies may contribute to the setting of future standards and guidelines to ensure a reliable risk characterization in the occupational environments crucial for the implementation of effective control measures. The search aimed at selecting studies between January 1st 2010 and June 30th 2023 in the selected databases. Fifty papers on virus exposure assessment fitted the eligibility criteria and were selected for data extraction. Overall, this study identified gaps in knowledge regarding virus assessment and pinpointed the needs for further research. Several discrepancies were found (transport temperatures, elution steps, …), as well as a lack of publication of important data related to the exposure conditions (contextual information). With the available information, it is impossible to compare results between studies employing different methods, and even if the same methods are used, different conclusions/recommendations based on the expert judgment have been reported due to the lack of consensus in the contextual information retrieved and/or data interpretation. Future research on the field targeting sampling methods and in the laboratory regarding the assays to employ should be developed bearing in mind the different goals of the assessment.
Mots-clé
Environmental Monitoring/methods, Humans, Air Microbiology, Occupational Exposure, Viruses/isolation & purification, Assays, Bioaerosols, Exposure assessment, Occupational, Sampling, Viruses
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
28/06/2024 11:02
Dernière modification de la notice
23/07/2024 5:56