MRI software for diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis may impact on patients' selection and clinical outcome.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 34350507_BIB_3EB793463DD7.pdf (3459.67 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_3EB793463DD7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
MRI software for diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis may impact on patients' selection and clinical outcome.
Périodique
European radiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Pistocchi S., Strambo D., Bartolini B., Maeder P., Meuli R., Michel P., Dunet V.
ISSN
1432-1084 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0938-7994
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
02/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Numéro
2
Pages
1144-1153
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Impact of different MR perfusion software on selection and outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unclear. We aimed at comparing two commercial MRI software, semi-automated with unadjusted (method A) and adjusted mask (method B), and fully automated (method C) in this setting.
MRI from 144 consecutive AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO was retrospectively analysed. All diffusion- and perfusion-weighted images (DWI-PWI) were post-processed with the three methods using standard thresholds. Concordance for core and hypoperfusion volumes was assessed with Lin's test. Clinical outcome was compared between groups in patients who underwent successful EVT in the early and late time window.
Mean core volume was higher and mean hypoperfusion volume was lower in method C than in methods A and B. In the early time window, methods A and B found fewer patients with a mismatch ratio ≤ 1.2 than method C (1/67 [1.5%] vs. 12/67 [17.9%], p = 0.0013). In the late time window, methods A and B found fewer patients with a mismatch ratio < 1.8 than method C (3/46 [6.5%] and 2/46 [4.3%] vs. 18/46 [39.1%], p ≤ 0.0002). More patients with functional independence at 3 months would not have been treated using method C versus methods A and B in the early (p = 0.0063) and late (p ≤ 0.011) time window.
MRI software for DWI-PWI analysis may influence patients' selection before EVT and clinical outcome.
• Method C detects fewer patients with favourable mismatch profile. • Method C might underselect more patients with functional independence at 3 months. • Software used before thrombectomy may influence patients' outcome.
Mots-clé
Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Perfusion, Retrospective Studies, Software, Stroke/diagnostic imaging, Thrombectomy, Treatment Outcome, Diffusion, Stroke
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
20/08/2021 15:33
Dernière modification de la notice
23/11/2022 7:10
Données d'usage