Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (263.94 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_3E1434CA23A5
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses.
Périodique
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Tozzi P., Hayoz D., Ruchat P., Corno A., Oedman C., Botta U., von Segesser L.K.
ISSN
1010-7940
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2001
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Numéro
4
Pages
477-481
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't - Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: An animal model has been developed to compare the effects of suture technique on the luminal dimensions and compliance of end-to-side vascular anastomoses. METHODS: Carotid and internal mammalian arteries (IMAs) were exposed in three pigs (90 kg). IMAs were sectioned distally to perform end-to-side anastomoses on carotid arteries. One anastomosis was performed with 7/0 polypropylene running suture. The other was performed with the automated suture delivery device (Perclose/Abbott Labs Inc.) that makes a 7/0 polypropylene interrupted suture. Four piezoelectric crystals were sutured on toe, heel and both lateral sides of each anastomosis to measure anastomotic axes. Anastomotic cross-sectional area (CSAA) was calculated with: CSAA = pi x mM/4 where m and M are the minor and major axes of the elliptical anastomosis. Cross-sectional anastomotic compliance (CSAC) was calculated as CSAC=Delta CSAA/Delta P where Delta P is the mean pulse pressure and Delta CSAA is the mean CSAA during cardiac cycle. RESULTS: We collected a total of 1200000 pressure-length data per animal. For running suture we had a mean systolic CSAA of 26.94+/-0.4 mm(2) and a mean CSAA in diastole of 26.30+/-0.5 mm(2) (mean Delta CSAA was 0.64 mm(2)). CSAC for running suture was 4.5 x 10(-6)m(2)/kPa. For interrupted suture we had a mean CSAA in systole of 21.98+/-0.2 mm(2) and a mean CSAA in diastole of 17.38+/-0.3 mm(2) (mean Delta CSAA was 4.6+/-0.1 mm(2)). CSAC for interrupted suture was 11 x 10(-6) m(2)/kPa. CONCLUSIONS: This model, even with some limitations, can be a reliable source of information improving the outcome of vascular anastomoses. The study demonstrates that suture technique has a substantial effect on cross-sectional anastomotic compliance of end-to-side anastomoses. Interrupted suture may maximise the anastomotic lumen and provides a considerably higher CSAC than continuous suture, that reduces flow turbulence, shear stress and intimal hyperplasia. The Heartflo anastomosis device is a reliable instrument that facilitates performance of interrupted suture anastomoses.
Mots-clé
Anastomosis, Surgical, Animals, Biomechanics, Coronary Artery Bypass, Models, Animal, Suture Techniques, Swine
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
17/01/2008 17:38
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 8:54
Données d'usage