Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_3BF018B72BF0
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.
Périodique
Heart Rhythm
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rod Gimbel J., Bello D., Schmitt M., Merkely B., Schwitter J., Hayes D.L., Sommer T., Schloss E.J., Chang Y., Willey S., Kanal E.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
Advisa MRI System Study Investigators
ISSN
1556-3871 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1547-5271
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Volume
10
Numéro
5
Pages
685-691
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pacemakers is a relative contraindication because of the risks to the patient from potentially hazardous interactions between the MRI and the pacemaker system. Chest scans (ie, cardiac magnetic resonance scans) are of particular importance and higher risk. The previously Food and Drug Administration-approved magnetic resonance conditional system includes positioning restrictions, limiting the powerful utility of MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety and effectiveness of a pacemaker system designed for safe whole body MRI without MRI scan positioning restrictions.
METHODS: Primary eligibility criteria included standard dual-chamber pacing indications. Patients (n = 263) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo 16 chest and head scans at 1.5 T between 9 and 12 weeks postimplant (n = 177) or to not undergo MRI (n = 86) post-implant. Evaluation of the pacemaker system occurred immediately before, during (monitoring), and after MRI, 1-week post-MRI, and 1-month post-MRI, and similarly for controls. Primary end points measured the MRI-related complication-free rate for safety and compared pacing capture threshold between MRI and control subjects for effectiveness.
RESULTS: There were no MRI-related complications during or after MRI in subjects undergoing MRI (n = 148). Differences in pacing capture threshold values from pre-MRI to 1-month post-MRI were minimal and similar between the MRI and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial demonstrates that the Advisa MRI pulse generator and CapSureFix MRI 5086MRI lead system is safe and effective in the 1.5 T MRI environment without positioning restrictions for MRI scans or limitations of body parts scanned.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
13/06/2013 18:11
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:32
Données d'usage