Freedom of choice of specialist physicians is important to Swiss resident: a cross-sectional study.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_3B78B3CA45B4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Freedom of choice of specialist physicians is important to Swiss resident: a cross-sectional study.
Périodique
Swiss Medical Weekly
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Peytremann-Bridevaux Isabelle, Ruffieux Christiane, Burnand Bernard
ISSN
1424-3997 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0036-7672
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
141
Pages
w13315
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Résumé
QUESTION UNDER STUDY: To assess how important the possibility to choose specialist physicians is for Swiss residents and to determine which variables are associated with this opinion.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2007 Swiss population-based health survey and included 13,642 non-institutionalised adults who responded to the telephone and paper questionnaires. The dependent variable included answers to the question "How important is it for you to be able to choose the specialist you would like to visit?" Independent variables included socio-demographics, health and past year healthcare use measures. Crude and adjusted logistic regressions for the importance of being able to choose specialist physicians were performed, accounting for the survey design.
RESULTS: 45% of participants found it very important to be able to choose the specialist physician they wanted to visit. The answers "rather important", "rather not important" and "not important" were reported by 28%, 20% and 7% of respondents. Women, individuals in middle/high executive position, those with an ordinary insurance scheme, those reporting ≥2 chronic conditions or poorer subjective health, or those who had had ≥2 outpatient visits in the preceding year were more likely to find this choice very important.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2007, almost half of all Swiss residents found it very important to be able to choose his/her specialist physician. The further development of physician networks or other chronic disease management initiatives in Switzerland, towards integrated care, need to pay attention to the freedom of choice of specialist physicians that Swiss residents value. Future surveys should provide information on access and consultations with specialist physicians.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Medicine, Middle Aged, Patient Freedom of Choice Laws/statistics & numerical data, Questionnaires, Specialization, Switzerland, Young Adult
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
26/01/2012 10:57
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:31
Données d'usage