S-Guide® : Comparaison du S-Guide avec le Gliderite®, dans l’intubation au vidéolaryngoscope chez des patients aux voies aériennes difficiles simulées

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Travail_de_Thèse_OK.pdf (844.12 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Après imprimatur
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_3A7CEE69058F
Type
Thèse: thèse de doctorat.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
S-Guide® : Comparaison du S-Guide avec le Gliderite®, dans l’intubation au vidéolaryngoscope chez des patients aux voies aériennes difficiles simulées
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Nkoulou Coralie Anne Agnès
Directeur⸱rice⸱s
Schoettker Patrick
Détails de l'institution
Université de Lausanne, Faculté de biologie et médecine
Statut éditorial
Acceptée
Date de publication
2021
Langue
français
Résumé
Objective: Gliderite™, one of the first stylets designed specifically to assist tracheal intubation with non-channelled curved blades videolaryngoscopes, can cause injury. The S-Guide® is a new, malleable, intubating guide allowing oxygenation. Its soft tip is designed to prevent trauma. We aimed to compare the duration of tracheal intubation with S-Guide compared to Gliderite using a C-MAC® D-Blade® videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated difficult airways.
Methods: We performed a single blinded prospective randomised study, with 50 adult patients requiring orotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia in Lausanne University Hospital. A cervical collar was fitted around patient’s neck to simulate difficult intubation conditions.
Exclusion criteria were ASA>3, BMI > 35 kg/m2, known or at risk of difficult intubation and risk of aspiration of gastric content. We recorded T1: Time to identification of the glottis; T2: time to inflate the cuff and T3: total intubation time (capnography curve appearance). Secondary outcomes were the presence of arytenoid contact during intubation and post-operative airway discomfort
Results: There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 (sec) while using the S- Guide or Gliderite respectively: 14.6 [9.6–18.6] vs 16.5 [11.0–20.6]; P=0.368 and 43.3 [33.2–
49.3] vs 46.3 [35.6–61.5], P=0.308. T3 (sec) was shorter in the S-Guide group: 58.1 [50.2–61.8] vs 65.3 [57.6–78.7], P=0.044. Fewer arytenoid contact occurred during intubation using the S- Guide (P=0.032), without difference in post-operative airway discomfort.
Conclusion: S-Guide assisted tracheal intubation, with a C-MAC D-Blade in simulated difficult airways, allows successful and faster intubation than with the Gliderite Stylet.
Mots-clé
videolaryngoscopic intubation, difficult airways, intubation trauma, stylet
Création de la notice
30/11/2021 11:04
Dernière modification de la notice
14/03/2024 7:09
Données d'usage