Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final 2-Year Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Biodegradable vs durable polymer.pdf (1104.37 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_381543F9BA7A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final 2-Year Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial.
Périodique
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Pilgrim T., Muller O., Heg D., Roffi M., Kurz D.J., Moarof I., Weilenmann D., Kaiser C., Tapponnier M., Losdat S., Eeckhout E., Valgimigli M., Jüni P., Windecker S., Iglesias J.F.
ISSN
1876-7605 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1936-8798
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
22/03/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Numéro
6
Pages
639-648
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) compared with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for patients with STEMI, and long-term outcomes are determined by the safety and efficacy profile of the newest generation drug-eluting stents.
BIOSTEMI (A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized superiority trial using Bayesian methods. Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI within 24 h of symptom onset were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive BP-SES (n = 649) or DP-EES (n = 651). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial reinfarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years.
Between April 2016 and March 2018, 1,300 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. Follow-up through 2 years was complete in 1,221 patients (94%). At 2 years, TLF occurred in 33 patients (5.1%) treated with BP-SES and in 53 patients (8.1%) treated with DP-EES (rate ratio: 0.58; 95% Bayesian credible interval: 0.40 to 0.84; posterior probability of superiority = 0.998). The difference was driven by a lower incidence of clinically indicated TLR in patients treated with BP-SES compared with DP-EES (2.5% vs. 5.1%; rate ratio: 0.52; 95% Bayesian credible interval: 0.30 to 0.87; posterior probability of superiority = 0.993). There were no significant differences in rates of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial reinfarction, and definite stent thrombosis between the 2 treatment arms.
In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, BP-SES were superior to DP-EES with respect to TLF at 2 years. The difference was driven by lower rates of ischemia-driven TLR. (A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [BIOSTEMI]; NCT02579031).
Mots-clé
Absorbable Implants, Bayes Theorem, Drug-Eluting Stents, Humans, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects, Polymers, Prosthesis Design, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy, Treatment Outcome, acute myocardial infarction, biodegradable polymer, drug-eluting stent(s), thin strut
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
27/03/2021 16:26
Dernière modification de la notice
19/12/2023 8:19
Données d'usage