Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_37FA99BADF7B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women.
Périodique
Archives of Internal Medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Ensrud K.E., Ewing S.K., Taylor B.C., Fink H.A., Cawthon P.M., Stone K.L., Hillier T.A., Cauley J.A., Hochberg M.C., Rodondi N., Tracy J.K., Cummings S.R.
ISSN
0003-9926
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
168
Numéro
4
Pages
382-389
Langue
anglais
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Frailty, as defined by the index derived from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS index), predicts risk of adverse outcomes in older adults. Use of this index, however, is impractical in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 6701 women 69 years or older to compare the predictive validity of a simple frailty index with the components of weight loss, inability to rise from a chair 5 times without using arms, and reduced energy level (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures [SOF index]) with that of the CHS index with the components of unintentional weight loss, poor grip strength, reduced energy level, slow walking speed, and low level of physical activity. Women were classified as robust, of intermediate status, or frail using each index. Falls were reported every 4 months for 1 year. Disability (> or =1 new impairment in performing instrumental activities of daily living) was ascertained at 4(1/2) years, and fractures and deaths were ascertained during 9 years of follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and -2 log likelihood statistics were compared for models containing the CHS index vs the SOF index. RESULTS: Increasing evidence of frailty as defined by either the CHS index or the SOF index was similarly associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Frail women had a higher age-adjusted risk of recurrent falls (odds ratio, 2.4), disability (odds ratio, 2.2-2.8), nonspine fracture (hazard ratio, 1.4-1.5), hip fracture (hazard ratio, 1.7-1.8), and death (hazard ratio, 2.4-2.7) (P < .001 for all models). The AUC comparisons revealed no differences between models with the CHS index vs the SOF index in discriminating falls (AUC = 0.61 for both models; P = .66), disability (AUC = 0.64; P = .23), nonspine fracture (AUC = 0.55; P = .80), hip fracture (AUC = 0.63; P = .64), or death (AUC = 0.72; P = .10). Results were similar when -2 log likelihood statistics were compared. CONCLUSION: The simple SOF index predicts risk of falls, disability, fracture, and death as well as the more complex CHS index and may provide a useful definition of frailty to identify older women at risk of adverse health outcomes in clinical practice.
Mots-clé
Accidental Falls, Aged, Cause of Death, Disabled Persons, Female, Fractures, Bone, Frail Elderly, Geriatric Assessment, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/03/2009 15:43
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:26
Données d'usage