Evaluation of the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in breast ultrasound according to the radiologist's experience
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_363BB66C9257
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Evaluation of the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in breast ultrasound according to the radiologist's experience
Périodique
Acad Radiol
ISSN-L
1878-4046 (Electronic)1076-6332 (Linking)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Numéro
3
Pages
311-9
Langue
anglais
Notes
Chabi, Marie-LaureBorget, IsabelleArdiles, RosarioAboud, GhassenBoussouar, SamiaVilar, VanessaDromain, ClarisseBalleyguier, CorinneengRandomized Controlled Trial2012/02/09 06:00Acad Radiol. 2012 Mar;19(3):311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.023.
Résumé
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for breast ultrasound to improve the characterization of breast lesions detected on ultrasound by junior and senior radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty ultrasound breast lesions were randomly reviewed blindly by four radiologists with different levels of expertise (from 20 years [radiologist A] to 4 months [radiologist D]), with and without the help of an ultrasound CAD system (B-CAD version 2). All lesions had been biopsied. Sensitivity and specificity with and without CAD were calculated for each radiologist for the following evaluation criteria: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category and the final diagnosis (benign or malignant). Intrinsic sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CAD alone were also calculated. RESULTS: CAD detected all cancers, and its use increased radiologists' sensitivity scores when this was possible (with vs without CAD: radiologist A, 99% vs 99%; radiologist B, 96% vs 87%; radiologist C, 95% vs 88%; radiologist D, 91% vs 88%). Seven additional cancers were diagnosed. However, the low specificity of CAD (48%) decreased the specificity of radiologists, especially of the more experienced among them (with vs without CAD: radiologist A, 46% vs 70%; radiologist B, 58% vs 80%; radiologist C, 57% vs 69%; radiologist D, 71% vs 71%). CONCLUSIONS: CAD for breast ultrasound appears to be a useful tool for improving the diagnosis of malignant lesions for junior radiologists. Nevertheless, its low specificity must be taken into account to limit biopsies of benign lesions.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms/*ultrasonography, Female, France, Humans, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Pattern Recognition, Automated/*methods, Physicians/*statistics & numerical data, Professional Competence/*statistics & numerical data, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methods, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Mammary/*methods, Young Adult
Site de l'éditeur
Création de la notice
16/09/2016 11:13
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:24