Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ-F) and of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, 12-item Short Form (PLUS-M Formulaire Court 12)
Détails
Télécharger: thèse.pdf (813.41 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Après imprimatur
Licence: Non spécifiée
Etat: Public
Version: Après imprimatur
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_300AD84A33A5
Type
Thèse: thèse de doctorat.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ-F) and of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, 12-item Short Form (PLUS-M Formulaire Court 12)
Directeur⸱rice⸱s
Benaim Charles
Détails de l'institution
Université de Lausanne, Faculté de biologie et médecine
Statut éditorial
Acceptée
Date de publication
2019
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Background: The PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form is a self-questionnaire that assesses the perceived capacity of lower limb amputees (LLAs) to perform a number of daily-life activities. Its psychometric properties are excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.9, fast administration and scoring, normative
data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes.
Objective: We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties.
Methods: We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence
scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach a and reliability
with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval.
Results: The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10-2 to 0.002; Cronbach a = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect.
Conclusions: The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric
properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change.
data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes.
Objective: We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties.
Methods: We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence
scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach a and reliability
with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval.
Results: The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10-2 to 0.002; Cronbach a = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect.
Conclusions: The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric
properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change.
Création de la notice
02/09/2019 9:07
Dernière modification de la notice
23/09/2019 8:14